Balancing Valve with Pressure Compensation Function

Name: Balancing Valve with Pressure Compensation Function
Brand: Jiangsu KM Hydraulic Control System Co., Ltd.
SKU: 1978518331

Jiangsu, ChinaJiangsu KM Hydraulic Control System Co., Ltd.

US$10.00

1 Piece

Product profile

Customization

Available

Material

Steel

Type

Abeb

Connector

Plate, Tube

Transport Package

Plywood Box

Specification

steel

Trademark

KM Hydraulic

Origin

China

HS Code

8481201090

Production Capacity

50000

Company profile

High Repeat Buyers ChoiceYears of Export ExperienceSelf-brandedExhibition Experience

Jiangsu KM Hydraulic Control System Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service Available CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Samples, Customization from Designs, etc. CertifiedExport Year: 13 Years CertifiedNearest Port: Shanghai PortAverage Response Time: ≤1.88h

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryJiangsu KM Hydraulic Control System Co., Ltd. is a limited company founded in 2009, specializing in hydraulic valves and related high-end hydraulic components. It operates a 19,618 m² manufacturing plant with 30 production lines and 89 employees, and has 13 years of export experience. The supplier reports ISO9001, ISO14001, ISO45001, and CCC certifications, documented service and complaint-handling procedures, and broad customization capabilities. Its R&D team consists of 11 engineers, but no SDK is available. The supplier provides OEM services for well-known brands, while no cooperation with Fortune 500 companies is reported. Financial records are indicated for 2021–2023, but the slices do not provide sufficient detail to assess financial strength. A manufacturing control weakness is explicitly reported: production quantities are not continuously reconciled for each batch or mass-production run.

Supplier typeThe supplier is a limited company founded in 2009 and specializes in the R&D, manufacturing, and sales of hydraulic components, with valves listed as its product scope. Its 19,618 m² plant, 89 employees, and 30 production lines support classification as a manufacturer rather than only a trading intermediary.

CertificationsThe supplier reports ISO9001:2015 and ISO14001:2015 certifications, along with ISO45001:2018 and CCC certification in other records. These stated quality, environmental, occupational health and safety, and product-compliance certifications provide explicit evidence of certification coverage.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier reports written procedures and followed records for service assessment, corrective and preventive actions, and customer complaints. It also offers multiple quotation and payment terms and states a one-month average lead time in both peak and off-season periods, although the slices do not describe warranty or technical-support scope.

R&D capabilityThe supplier describes itself as focused on R&D of high-end hydraulic components and reports 11 R&D engineers, while its company profile identifies it as a national high-tech enterprise. However, it explicitly has no available SDK, and the slices do not provide innovation results, patents, or product-development metrics.

Production capacityThe supplier operates a 19,618 m² manufacturing plant with 30 production lines and reports a one-month average lead time in both peak and off-season periods. Nevertheless, it explicitly states that the factory does not continuously reconcile quantities for each batch or mass-production run, which is a documented production-control deficiency.

Customization capabilityThe supplier supports customization from samples, designs, full customization, minor customization, and flexible customization. It also reports OEM service for well-known brands, providing direct evidence of broad product adaptation and OEM capability.

Client casesThe supplier reports providing OEM services for well-known brands and a repeat-buyer preference rate of 80%–100%. However, it explicitly reports no cooperation with Fortune 500 companies, and no named customer cases are provided, so the evidence supports customer retention and OEM experience but not major-brand case verification.