Cost Effective Pneumatic Spray Equipment PU Foam Machine for Insulation

Name: Cost Effective Pneumatic Spray Equipment PU Foam Machine for Insulation
Brand: Shandong Rhine River International Trade Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2037424752

Shandong, ChinaShandong Rhine River International Trade Co., Ltd.

US$3,200.00

1-2 set

US$3,100.00

3-4 set

US$3,000.00

5+ set

Product profile

Customization

Available

Application

PU Foam Spraying Machine

Warranty

1 Year

Model NO.

A200

Product Type

Spray Machine

Processing Type

Foaming Machine

Voltage

220V50Hz/380V50Hz

Power (Kw)

9kw

Ratio of Raw Material

1:1

Max Working Pressure

15MPa

Certifications

ISO/CE

Type

Air Spray Equipment

Certification

CE, ISO

Method Type

Manual

Condition

New

After-sales Service

1 Year

Coating

PU Foam Material

Transport Package

Plywood Box

Specification

90*75*143cm

Origin

Shandong

HS Code

8424899990

Production Capacity

100 Sets/Mounth

Company profile

Shandong Rhine River International Trade Co., Ltd.

Shandong, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/FactoryExport Year: 2022-12-18Nearest Port: QingdaoAverage Response Time: ≤2.74hTerms of Payment: T/T, PayPal, Western UnionInternational Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, EXW, CFR, CIF, DAP

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryShandong Rhine International Trade Co., Ltd. is a limited company and independent importer/exporter offering polyol, isocyanate, polymeric MDI, and polyether polyol. It reports ISO 9001 certification, ODM and sample-based customization services, and export activity to multiple regions. Service lead time is stated as within 15 workdays in both peak and off-season, with 12 qualified service-capable suppliers identified. However, the investigation shows no written procedures or records for supplier-service assessment, corrective actions, or complaint handling; no inventory, overseas warehouse, overseas showroom, overseas agents or branches, SDK, raw-material traceability, or quality-control test equipment. One R&D engineer is reported, with no new products launched in the last year. Financial evidence is limited to year labels rather than assessable financial metrics. Audit information records CTI as the organization, but the evaluation result is stated as 0.

Supplier typeThe supplier is identified as a limited company with no larger-company group affiliation. Its listed product scope is polyol, isocyanate, polymeric MDI, and polyether polyol, while the audit record identifies the same product group as its primary offering.

CertificationsThe company description explicitly states that the supplier has passed ISO 9001 quality system certification, and quality assurance in quality-control processes is also reported as present. However, the provided audit record shows an evaluation result of 0, so the broader effectiveness of its quality system cannot be established from the slices alone.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier states service lead times within 15 workdays in both peak and off-season and identifies 12 qualified service-capable suppliers. Nevertheless, it has no overseas agents or branches, overseas warehouse, showroom, inventory service, or offline trade-show participation, and lacks written procedures or records for corrective actions and complaint handling.

R&D capabilityThe supplier offers ODM services, but reports only one R&D engineer, no available SDK, and no new products launched during the previous year. These explicit limitations indicate weak demonstrated innovation output despite the stated ODM availability.

Production capacityThe supplier reports 12 qualified suppliers for service capability and lead times within 15 workdays, but has no in-stock service capacity and no stated overseas manufacturing-support infrastructure. Quality-control test equipment is reported as 0, and no written supplier-service assessment procedure or records are available, limiting evidence of robust production control.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly provides ODM services and offers customization from samples. These statements directly support the availability of product-design or sample-based customization, although no evidence is provided regarding the scale, technical depth, or delivery performance of customized projects.