Polyether Polyols as The Core Polyurethane Foam Mattress Manufacturing Material Factory Special

Name: Polyether Polyols as The Core Polyurethane Foam Mattress Manufacturing Material Factory Special
Brand: Shandong Rhine River International Trade Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2073524192

Shandong, ChinaShandong Rhine River International Trade Co., Ltd.

US$3.90

200-19,999 kg

US$3.60

20,000+ kg

Sample price:US$3.90/kg.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

CAS No.

9003-11-6

Formula

C5h10o2

Model NO.

TDI

EINECS

618-355-0

Molecular Principal Chain

Carbon Chain Polymer

Color

White

Appearance

Colorless Transparent Liquid

Usage

Flexible Foam, Hr Foam(High Resilience Soft Foam),

Hydroxyl Value

56±2

Acid Value

≤0.06

Water Content

≤0.08

Density

1.029 G/Ml

K+ Na+Content

≤5

Unsaturation

≤0.06

Viscosity

400-600

pH Value

5.0-7.0

Warranty

1 Year

Specification

200KG/Drum

Trademark

Rhine

Origin

China

Production Capacity

50000

Company profile

Shandong Rhine River International Trade Co., Ltd.

Shandong, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/FactoryExport Year: 2022-12-18Nearest Port: QingdaoAverage Response Time: ≤3.17hTerms of Payment: T/T, PayPal, Western UnionInternational Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, EXW, CFR, CIF, DAP

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryShandong Rhine International Trade Co., Ltd. is a limited company and independent importer/exporter offering polyol, isocyanate, polymeric MDI, and polyether polyol. It reports ISO 9001 certification, ODM and sample-based customization services, and export activity to multiple regions. Service lead time is stated as within 15 workdays in both peak and off-season, with 12 qualified service-capable suppliers identified. However, the investigation shows no written procedures or records for supplier-service assessment, corrective actions, or complaint handling; no inventory, overseas warehouse, overseas showroom, overseas agents or branches, SDK, raw-material traceability, or quality-control test equipment. One R&D engineer is reported, with no new products launched in the last year. Financial evidence is limited to year labels rather than assessable financial metrics. Audit information records CTI as the organization, but the evaluation result is stated as 0.

Supplier typeThe supplier is identified as a limited company with no larger-company group affiliation. Its listed product scope is polyol, isocyanate, polymeric MDI, and polyether polyol, while the audit record identifies the same product group as its primary offering.

CertificationsThe company description explicitly states that the supplier has passed ISO 9001 quality system certification, and quality assurance in quality-control processes is also reported as present. However, the provided audit record shows an evaluation result of 0, so the broader effectiveness of its quality system cannot be established from the slices alone.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier states service lead times within 15 workdays in both peak and off-season and identifies 12 qualified service-capable suppliers. Nevertheless, it has no overseas agents or branches, overseas warehouse, showroom, inventory service, or offline trade-show participation, and lacks written procedures or records for corrective actions and complaint handling.

R&D capabilityThe supplier offers ODM services, but reports only one R&D engineer, no available SDK, and no new products launched during the previous year. These explicit limitations indicate weak demonstrated innovation output despite the stated ODM availability.

Production capacityThe supplier reports 12 qualified suppliers for service capability and lead times within 15 workdays, but has no in-stock service capacity and no stated overseas manufacturing-support infrastructure. Quality-control test equipment is reported as 0, and no written supplier-service assessment procedure or records are available, limiting evidence of robust production control.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly provides ODM services and offers customization from samples. These statements directly support the availability of product-design or sample-based customization, although no evidence is provided regarding the scale, technical depth, or delivery performance of customized projects.