What certifications does the product have?

The product holds ISO and CE certifications.

Cigarette Machine Conveyor Belt Garniture Tape for Mk8 Mk9 Parts

Name: Cigarette Machine Conveyor Belt Garniture Tape for Mk8 Mk9 Parts
Brand: Guangzhou Binhao Technology Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2269572315

Guangdong, ChinaGuangzhou Binhao Technology Co., Ltd.

US$6.00

50-99 Rolls

US$5.80

100+ Rolls

Sample price:US$6.00/roll.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Certification

ISO, CE

Material Capabilities

Aramid

Type

Conveyor

Product Name

Garniture Tape

Material

Aramid Fiber / Composite Material

Applicable Industry

Tobacco Machinery

Function

Cigarette Rod Forming & Conveying

Compatible Models

Mk8 Mk9 Cigarette Making Machine

Feature

High Wear Resistance

Customized

OEM Accepted

Condition

Brand New

Color

Yellow, White

Trademark

BINHAO

Origin

China

Key features

Premium Wear Resistant Material: Made from Aramid fiber for high wear resistance and durability.

Exact Fit Specifications: Manufactured to exact dimensions for proper fit on Mk8 and Mk9 machines.

OEM Customization Accepted: Customized products available with OEM services for specific needs.

Easy Installation: Designed for easy installation without requiring machine modifications.

Reduced Vibration: Minimizes vibration during high-speed production for better quality.

Longer Service Life: Withstands constant friction and tension to reduce replacement frequency.

ISO and CE Certified: Product meets international ISO and CE certification standards.

Company profile

Guangzhou Binhao Technology Co., Ltd.

Guangdong, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/FactoryExport Year: 2009-10-10Nearest Port: Huangpu, Guangzhou, Shekou, Shenzhen, Nansha, GuangzhouAverage Response Time: ≤7.12hTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.International Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, CFR, CIF, FAS, DDP, FCA, EXW

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryGuangzhou Binhao Technology Co., Ltd. is identified as a China-based manufacturer/factory producing cigarette-industry packaging materials, including tipping paper, aluminum foil paper, films, tear tape, cigarette cardboard paper, inner frames, and shisha packaging materials. The supplier reports substantial annual paper and BOPP film output and offers multiple quotation and payment terms, with stated lead times of within 15 working days in both peak and off-season periods. It has participated in the World Tobacco Show - Asia but reports no overseas showroom, agent, or branch. Customization from samples and designs is available, while professional R&D, 3D design, ODM, SDK, and recent new-product development are not evidenced or are explicitly unavailable. The supplier claims quality and after-sales strengths, but no written service assessment, complaint-handling, corrective-action, or approved-supplier procedures are reported. Certification, financial performance details, environmental assessment,...

Supplier typeThe supplier is explicitly identified as a manufacturer/factory and a limited company in China, with products focused on cigarette and shisha packaging materials. Its stated product range and manufacturing classification support treating it as a specialized packaging-material manufacturer rather than a trading-only entity.

R&D capabilityThe supplier explicitly reports no professional technical-supplier R&D capability, no 3D software design service, no ODM service, no SDK, and no new products during the past year. These stated limitations indicate a weak innovation and independent-development profile.

Production capacityThe supplier is identified as a manufacturer/factory and reports annual output exceeding 6,000 tons of paper and 5,000 tons of BOPP film, with lead times within 15 working days in both peak and off-season. Its proximity to Huangpu Port and broad product scope further support operational production capability.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly offers customization from samples and customization from designs. However, it does not provide 3D software design services or ODM, so the evidence supports execution of customer-provided specifications rather than comprehensive design-led development.