Lot Number Date Coding Thermal Transfer Stamping Barcode Printing Ribbon

Name: Lot Number Date Coding Thermal Transfer Stamping Barcode Printing Ribbon
Brand: Guangzhou Bowen Packing Material Co., Ltd
SKU: 2062488902

Guangdong, ChinaGuangzhou Bowen Packing Material Co., Ltd

US$0.55

100-999 Square Meters

US$0.45

1,000-9,999 Square Meters

US$0.35

10,000-99,999 Square Meters

US$0.25

100,000+ Square Meters

Sample price:US$0.02/piece.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Feature

Compatible

Color

Blue

Model NO.

Thermal Transfer Ribbon

Thermal Transfer Ribbon Axis Dimension

1/2 Inch

Thermal Transfer Ribbon Roll

Carbon Inside

Certification

ISO, ISO9001, CE, RoHS, MSDS

Transfer Mode

Direct Printing

Method

Heat Transfer Printing

Usage

Plate, Fabric, Bag, Leather, Cotton, Cup, Garment

Name

TTR

TTR Ribbon Color

Black, White, Gold, Silver

Humidity

40%-80%

Storage

-5-49 Degree

Storage Humidity

25%-80% Humidity Rate

Width

30mm, 40mm, 50mm, 60mm

Length

30m, 74m, 90m, 100m, 300m

Packaging

Packing in Rolls with Cartons

Delivery Time

7 -15 Days

Sevice

OEM/ ODM

Customized

Logo and Packaging, Brands

Supply Ability

100, 000 Rolls Per Day

Single Gross Weight

0.5 - 1 Kg

Shipping Port

Qingdao, Shanghai, Any Port in China

Cartons Packaging

20-50 Rolls Per Carton

Transport Package

Carton

Specification

Customized Size

Trademark

Origin

China

HS Code

9612200000

Production Capacity

100000000

Company profile

Importers and ExportersFast DeliveryQuality AssuranceProduction Process Visualization

Guangzhou Bowen Packing Material Co., Ltd

Guangdong, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Samples, Flexible customization CertifiedExport Year: 1 Year CertifiedNearest Port: Guangzhou PortAverage Response Time: ≤7.86h

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier demonstrates ODM availability, sample-based and flexible customization, documented quality-control, corrective-action, complaint-handling, and traceability procedures. It reports inventory capability, export rights, accepted international trade and payment terms, and lead times within 15 working days in both peak and off-peak seasons. However, evidence also shows no SDK, no OEM service for popular brands, no overseas agents, branches, warehouse, showroom, or offline trade-show participation. Manufacturing controls have notable gaps: no valid contract with related subcontractors, no continuous quantity reconciliation, and no outsourcing SOP. Financial information is present for selected years, but it does not establish financial strength or credibility. Production data is inconsistent between the reported single production line and the company description of 17 fully automatic lines.

Supplier typeThe supplier provides ODM service, flexible customization, inventory service, export rights, and manufacturing capacity. It does not provide popular-brand OEM services and has no overseas agents, branches, warehouses, or showrooms, indicating a manufacturer-oriented supplier with limited overseas service infrastructure.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier has a clear, recorded procedure for handling customer complaints and corrective/preventive actions, which supports after-sales issue management. However, it lacks overseas agents, branches, warehouses, and showrooms, limiting demonstrated local after-sales coverage.

Production capacityThe supplier reports inventory capability, a thermal-transfer-ribbon output of 75,000,000 square meters, and lead times within 15 working days. Nonetheless, production-line information conflicts materially: one line is reported in manufacturing records while the company description states 17 fully automatic coating and cutting lines; quantity reconciliation and outsourcing SOPs are also absent.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly offers ODM service and customization from samples with flexible customization. This is direct evidence of customization capability, although the absence of an SDK indicates that customization may not include software-development integration.