Brand Road Roller Sem922f 210 HP Motor Grader Construction Machinery with Best Price

Name: Brand Road Roller Sem922f 210 HP Motor Grader Construction Machinery with Best Price
Brand: Caterbe Construction Equipment (Wuhan) Co., Ltd.
SKU: 1992832471

Hubei, ChinaCaterbe Construction Equipment (Wuhan) Co., Ltd.

US$98,800.00

1-4 Pieces

US$95,800.00

5+ Pieces

Sample price:US$45000.00/piece.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

After-sales Service

1 Year

Warranty

1 Year

Model NO.

SEM922F

Certification

ISO, RoHS, CE

Condition

New

Application

Farmland

Transmission

Power

Walking Mode

Wheeled

Type

Large Grader

Travel Speed (Forward/Reverse)

40km/25h

Max. Drawbar Traction

99kN

Min. Turning Radius

7,800mm

Tire

17.5-25 12pr

Engine Model

Sc9d220g2

Specification

11, 100*2, 630*3, 140mm

Origin

China

HS Code

8429201000

Production Capacity

50000 Pieces/Year

Company profile

Importers and ExportersHigh Repeat Buyers ChoiceMulti-language Pioneer

Caterbe Construction Equipment (Wuhan) Co., Ltd.

Hubei, China

Business Type: Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: OEM Service Available CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Designs CertifiedExport Year: 5 Years CertifiedNearest Port: Shanghai PortAverage Response Time: ≤2.10h

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryCaterbe Construction Equipment (Wuhan) Co., Ltd. is a China-based trading company established in 2022 with 20 employees. It offers a broad range of construction and agricultural machinery, reports production information for several equipment categories, and indicates one-month lead times in both peak and off-peak seasons. The supplier claims OEM service for well-known brands and design-based customization, but has no ODM service and no new products launched in the past year. R&D resources are limited to one engineer, with no available SDK. After-sales infrastructure is weakly documented: there are no overseas showrooms, agents, branches, or offline trade-show participation, and no written complaint-handling, corrective-action, or service-assessment procedures. Quality-control staffing and assurance status are unavailable. Financial information is represented only by years, without assessable performance data. No certification information or customer cases are provided.

Supplier typeThe supplier is explicitly identified as a trading company, organized as a limited company in China and operating from Wuhan, Hubei. Its stated employee count is 20 and its establishment date is May 24, 2022, indicating a relatively recently established trading entity rather than a clearly identified manufacturer.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier describes customer service and after-sales support, but reports no overseas showroom, overseas agent or branch, offline trade-show participation, or overseas service countries. It also has no written procedures or records for complaint handling, corrective and preventive actions, or service-capability assessment, indicating materially limited documented after-sales infrastructure.

R&D capabilityInnovation resources are limited: the supplier reports one R&D engineer, no available SDK, no new products launched in the past year, and no product information generated through R&D during that period. It does provide design-based customization, but this does not demonstrate strong independent product innovation.

Production capacityThe supplier reports annual output of 5,000 pieces each for truck cranes, crawler cranes, wheel loaders, excavators, and bulldozers, with one-month lead times in both peak and off-peak seasons. However, it is identified as a trading company, and the provided slices do not clarify whether these capacities are owned production capacity or sourced capacity; therefore, the output claims demonstrate stated supply capability but not definitively owned manufacturing capability.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly provides customization from customer designs and also states that it offers OEM services for well-known brands. It does not provide ODM services, so the evidence supports design-led customization and OEM execution rather than original product development.