Angle Steel Q235 Q345 Carbon Equal Angle Steel Iron for Building Structure

Name: Angle Steel Q235 Q345 Carbon Equal Angle Steel Iron for Building Structure
Brand: Shanghai Changzeng Metal Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2209492255

Shanghai, ChinaShanghai Changzeng Metal Co., Ltd.

US$398.00-458.00

1 Ton

Sample price:US$589.00/ton.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Alloy

Non-alloy

Technique

Hot Rollled

Model NO.

Q235b

Type

Stainless Steel

Standard

GB, ASTM, JIS, AISI

Certificated

ISO9001:2008/SGS/BV

Name

Hot Rolled Equal Angel Steel

Shape

Equilateral Angle Bar

Grade

Q195-Q420 Series

Surface Treatment

Hot DIP Galvanised

Length

6m-12m

Application

Engineering Structure

Surface

Galvanized Painted

Material

Q235/Q345/Ss400/Q420/Q460/S235jr/S275jr/S355jr

Transport Package

Iron Belt Fastened, or Customize Package.

Trademark

Tang Steel

Origin

Tianjin, China

Production Capacity

5000 Tons/ Month

Company profile

Years of Export ExperienceHigh Repeat Buyers ChoiceIn-stock CapacityQuality Assurance

Shanghai Changzeng Metal Co., Ltd.

Shanghai, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading Company CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Samples, Customization from Designs, etc.Export Year: 2016-01-13Nearest Port: Shanghai Port, Tianjin Port, Qingdao PortAverage Response Time: ≤4.22hTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, PayPal, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is a Shanghai-based trading company that also identifies as a manufacturer/factory, with 19 years of export experience and 90% of sales from exports. It offers broad customization from samples, designs, and full-custom requirements, and reports standardized finished-product inspection instructions and quality assurance. However, the available information shows no new products in the past year, no ODM, SDK, overseas agents, overseas warehouse, showroom, or offline trade-show participation. Corrective/preventive action and complaint-handling procedures are undocumented, while supplier-service assessment procedures and approved supplier records are absent. Financial operating figures provided are zero, but their interpretation is not independently verifiable from the slices. Customer cases and certifications are not provided.

Supplier typeThe supplier is described as a trading company in Shanghai and is also identified as a Trading Company, Manufacturer/Factory. This indicates a mixed trading and manufacturing business classification, but the slices do not establish the scale or scope of its own production facilities.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier reports in-stock service capacity and lead times within 15 working days in both peak and off-seasons. However, it has no overseas warehouse, overseas showroom, overseas agents or branches, and no written procedures or records for complaint handling or corrective and preventive actions, limiting evidence of a structured after-sales system.

Financial creditThe provided financial fields report zero operating revenue, profit, margins, current ratios, and cash outflows for the stated periods, while the supplier is listed as a limited company with registered capital information. These reported operating indicators provide explicit evidence of weak financial performance, although the slices do not explain the data quality or accounting context.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports no new products in the past year, no ODM service, and no available SDK. These statements directly indicate limited demonstrated recent product-development and technical innovation capability.

Production capacityThe supplier is classified as both a trading company and manufacturer/factory, has in-stock capacity, and reports standardized instructions for finished-product inspection and quality assurance. Nevertheless, outsourcing procedures and manufacturing-capacity contract status are unknown, and only one quality assurance/quality control inspector is reported, so production depth cannot be fully confirmed.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly offers customization from samples, customization from designs, full customization, minor customization, and flexible customization in both design-service and R&D-related descriptions. This is direct evidence of broad customization coverage, although it does not quantify engineering resources or production limits.