Is the product CE certified?

Yes, all our machines are CE certified to ensure quality and safety standards.

Articulated Agricultural Tractor Backhoe with Fixed Boom

Name: Articulated Agricultural Tractor Backhoe with Fixed Boom
Brand: Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2118693375

Jiangsu, ChinaChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

US$2,400.00-2,800.00

5 Pieces

Product profile

Customization

Available

Warranty

1 Year

Type

Crawler Excavator

Model NO.

Usage

Mining Excavator

Bucket

Backhoe

Transmission

Hydraulic Transmission

Size

Medium-Sized

Certification

Condition

New

Backhoe

Bh175, 195, 225

Transport Package

Steel Crates

Specification

CE Standard

Trademark

Kaideli

Origin

Changzhou, China

Production Capacity

50PCS/Month

Key features

Versatile Agricultural Use: Ideal for digging, trenching, cleaning construction sites, and smoothing terrain.

Reliable Hydraulic System: Features a tough hydraulic arm with joystick-style control for precise operation.

Stable Support Structure: Individually controlled support legs and boom lockout pins ensure safety during transport.

One Year Warranty: Comprehensive one-year warranty covers all products with strict quality control.

OEM/ODM Customization: Customized backhoe models (BH175, 195, 225) available based on customer requirements.

CE Certified Quality: Products meet CE certification standards for safety and quality assurance.

Fast Lead Time: Complete production equipment ensures short lead times and competitive pricing.

Company profile

Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service AvailableExport Year: 2011-12-01 CertifiedNearest Port: Shanghai PortAverage Response Time: ≤2.65h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd. is a China-based limited company established in 2011, with operations in Jiangsu and manufacturing facilities in Changzhou. The supplier reports agricultural machinery and component manufacturing experience, five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, 90% export sales, and exports to approximately 30 countries. It claims CE certification for most popular products and describes service responsiveness, but no supplier management-system certification is recorded. Evidence indicates established production and export capability, with four years of R&D engineer experience and 11–20 quality-control staff reported. However, the available information does not sufficiently verify financial strength, customization capability, after-sales execution, or specific customer cases.

Supplier typeThe supplier is legally identified as a limited company and commercially described as both a manufacturing/processing machinery business and a trade company. Its stated products, factory, production lines, and manufacturing history support a combined manufacturing-and-trading profile rather than a purely trading operation.

CertificationsThe supplier states that it has CE certification for most popular products, indicating product-level certification coverage. However, supplier management-system certification is explicitly listed as NIL, so the evidence supports CE certification claims but not certified management systems.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports four years of R&D engineer experience, more than five technicians, and accumulated design and manufacturing experience in agricultural machinery and components. This supports some technical development capability, but there is no evidence of patents, new-product development records, or dedicated innovation systems.

Production capacityProduction capability is supported by five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, reported output of about 300 containers exported to 30 countries, and a one-month stated lead time in both peak and off-peak seasons. The slices also report more than 80 workers in one company description, while another record lists 58 employees; this inconsistency limits confidence in the exact workforce size but does not negate the evidence of operating production capacity.