What payment terms are accepted?

Accepted payment terms include LC, T/T, D/P, PayPal, and Western Union.

What is the discharge hood rotation range?

The discharge hood offers 360-degree rotation for flexible operation.

Where is the nearest shipping port?

The nearest port for shipment is Shanghai Port.

Big Power Pto Mini Wood Cutting Mulcher Chipper Hydraulic Feed

Name: Big Power Pto Mini Wood Cutting Mulcher Chipper Hydraulic Feed
Brand: Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.
SKU: 1992767555

Jiangsu, ChinaChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

US$700.00-2,500.00

5 Pieces

Product profile

Customization

Available

Type

Wood Chipper

Certification

Model NO.

BX42, BX42R

Wood Chipper

Bx42, 62,Bx122r,ATS500

Transport Package

Steel Crates

Specification

CE Standard

Trademark

Kaideli

Origin

Changzhou, China

Production Capacity

100 Sets Per Month

Key features

Self-Feeding Chute Design: Hopper angles brush against rotor and blades for efficient branch processing.

Hydraulic Feed System: Available on BX92RS and BX122R models for powerful and controlled feeding.

Multiple Model Options: Models BX42, BX62, BX92RS, and BX122R available for varying capacities.

CE Certification: Product meets European safety and quality standards for certification.

OEM and ODM Services: Custom manufacturing services available for specific client requirements.

3-Point Hitch Mounting: Compatible with standard tractor 3-point hitch systems for easy attachment.

High Capacity Processing: Chipper capacity ranges from 100mm to 300mm depending on the model.

Company profile

Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service AvailableExport Year: 2011-12-01 CertifiedNearest Port: Shanghai PortAverage Response Time: ≤2.04h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd. is a China-based limited company established in 2011, with operations in Jiangsu and manufacturing facilities in Changzhou. The supplier reports agricultural machinery and component manufacturing experience, five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, 90% export sales, and exports to approximately 30 countries. It claims CE certification for most popular products and describes service responsiveness, but no supplier management-system certification is recorded. Evidence indicates established production and export capability, with four years of R&D engineer experience and 11–20 quality-control staff reported. However, the available information does not sufficiently verify financial strength, customization capability, after-sales execution, or specific customer cases.

Supplier typeThe supplier is legally identified as a limited company and commercially described as both a manufacturing/processing machinery business and a trade company. Its stated products, factory, production lines, and manufacturing history support a combined manufacturing-and-trading profile rather than a purely trading operation.

CertificationsThe supplier states that it has CE certification for most popular products, indicating product-level certification coverage. However, supplier management-system certification is explicitly listed as NIL, so the evidence supports CE certification claims but not certified management systems.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports four years of R&D engineer experience, more than five technicians, and accumulated design and manufacturing experience in agricultural machinery and components. This supports some technical development capability, but there is no evidence of patents, new-product development records, or dedicated innovation systems.

Production capacityProduction capability is supported by five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, reported output of about 300 containers exported to 30 countries, and a one-month stated lead time in both peak and off-peak seasons. The slices also report more than 80 workers in one company description, while another record lists 58 employees; this inconsistency limits confidence in the exact workforce size but does not negate the evidence of operating production capacity.