Is the discharge hood rotatable?

Yes, all models feature a 360-degree rotating discharge hood.

What is the warranty policy?

Specific warranty details are not provided in the description; please contact us for terms.

What is the shipping port?

The nearest port for export is Shanghai Port.

CE Approved Tractor Wood Chipper Bx42 Bx42r Bx62s Bx62r Bx92RS

Name: CE Approved Tractor Wood Chipper Bx42 Bx42r Bx62s Bx62r Bx92RS
Brand: Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.
SKU: 1990496495

Jiangsu, ChinaChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

US$700.00-2,500.00

5 Pieces

Product profile

Customization

Available

Certification

Wood Chipper

Bx42,62

Model NO.

BX42, BX42R, BX62, BX62R, BX62RS, BX92RS

Transport Package

Steel Crates

Specification

CE Standard

Trademark

Kaideli

Origin

Changzhou, China

Production Capacity

100 Sets Per Month

Key features

CE Certification: Product meets CE safety standards for European markets.

Multiple Models Available: Models BX42, BX62, BX92RS, and BX122R offer capacities from 100mm to 300mm.

Self-Feed Hopper Design: Angled hopper automatically feeds brush against rotor and blades for efficient shredding.

Hydraulic Feed System: Advanced models BX92RS and BX122R feature hydraulic feed for heavy-duty operation.

OEM and ODM Services: Custom manufacturing solutions available for specific client requirements.

Wide Tractor Compatibility: Compatible with tractors ranging from 18HP to 120HP depending on the model.

Durable Construction: Built with robust 3-point hitch mounting and heavy-duty rotor systems.

Company profile

Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service AvailableExport Year: 2011-12-01 CertifiedNearest Port: Shanghai PortAverage Response Time: ≤2.71h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd. is a China-based limited company established in 2011, with operations in Jiangsu and manufacturing facilities in Changzhou. The supplier reports agricultural machinery and component manufacturing experience, five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, 90% export sales, and exports to approximately 30 countries. It claims CE certification for most popular products and describes service responsiveness, but no supplier management-system certification is recorded. Evidence indicates established production and export capability, with four years of R&D engineer experience and 11–20 quality-control staff reported. However, the available information does not sufficiently verify financial strength, customization capability, after-sales execution, or specific customer cases.

Supplier typeThe supplier is legally identified as a limited company and commercially described as both a manufacturing/processing machinery business and a trade company. Its stated products, factory, production lines, and manufacturing history support a combined manufacturing-and-trading profile rather than a purely trading operation.

CertificationsThe supplier states that it has CE certification for most popular products, indicating product-level certification coverage. However, supplier management-system certification is explicitly listed as NIL, so the evidence supports CE certification claims but not certified management systems.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports four years of R&D engineer experience, more than five technicians, and accumulated design and manufacturing experience in agricultural machinery and components. This supports some technical development capability, but there is no evidence of patents, new-product development records, or dedicated innovation systems.

Production capacityProduction capability is supported by five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, reported output of about 300 containers exported to 30 countries, and a one-month stated lead time in both peak and off-peak seasons. The slices also report more than 80 workers in one company description, while another record lists 58 employees; this inconsistency limits confidence in the exact workforce size but does not negate the evidence of operating production capacity.