What is the lead time for delivery?

The average lead time is one month for both peak and off-peak seasons.

What payment terms are accepted?

We accept LC, T/T, D/P, PayPal, and Western Union for payment.

Can I visit the factory?

Yes, we welcome factory visits and provide excellent reception for all visitors.

CE Standard Compact Tractor Implement Verge Mower with 1200-1600 Cutting Width (AGL)

Name: CE Standard Compact Tractor Implement Verge Mower with 1200-1600 Cutting Width (AGL)
Brand: Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2014965205

Jiangsu, ChinaChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

US$900.00-1,100.00

5 Pieces

Product profile

Customization

Available

After-sales Service

Yes

Warranty

1 Year

Model NO.

AGL125, 145, 165

Certification

Application

Lawn, Farmland

Working Way

Rotary

Type

Tractor

Tilt-up Angle

90°

Tilt-Down Angle

55°

Flail Type

Hammer/Y Blade

Feature

2-Stroke, Height Adjustable Handles, Steel Chassi

Transport Package

Steel Crate

Specification

CE Standard

Trademark

Kaideli

Origin

Changzhou, China

Production Capacity

100 Sets Per Month

Key features

CE Standard Certification: Meets CE safety standards for European markets.

Adjustable Cutting Width: Available in 1200mm, 1400mm, and 1600mm models.

Hydraulic Adjustments: Features hydraulic side and incline adjustments for precision.

1-Year Warranty: Comprehensive warranty coverage for quality assurance.

High Power Gearbox: Equipped with a robust 50hp gearbox for heavy-duty performance.

Safety Design: Includes safety flaps, solid hitch, and self-leveling features.

Company profile

Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service AvailableExport Year: 2011-12-01 CertifiedNearest Port: Shanghai PortAverage Response Time: ≤2.19h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd. is a China-based limited company established in 2011, with operations in Jiangsu and manufacturing facilities in Changzhou. The supplier reports agricultural machinery and component manufacturing experience, five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, 90% export sales, and exports to approximately 30 countries. It claims CE certification for most popular products and describes service responsiveness, but no supplier management-system certification is recorded. Evidence indicates established production and export capability, with four years of R&D engineer experience and 11–20 quality-control staff reported. However, the available information does not sufficiently verify financial strength, customization capability, after-sales execution, or specific customer cases.

Supplier typeThe supplier is legally identified as a limited company and commercially described as both a manufacturing/processing machinery business and a trade company. Its stated products, factory, production lines, and manufacturing history support a combined manufacturing-and-trading profile rather than a purely trading operation.

CertificationsThe supplier states that it has CE certification for most popular products, indicating product-level certification coverage. However, supplier management-system certification is explicitly listed as NIL, so the evidence supports CE certification claims but not certified management systems.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports four years of R&D engineer experience, more than five technicians, and accumulated design and manufacturing experience in agricultural machinery and components. This supports some technical development capability, but there is no evidence of patents, new-product development records, or dedicated innovation systems.

Production capacityProduction capability is supported by five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, reported output of about 300 containers exported to 30 countries, and a one-month stated lead time in both peak and off-peak seasons. The slices also report more than 80 workers in one company description, while another record lists 58 employees; this inconsistency limits confidence in the exact workforce size but does not negate the evidence of operating production capacity.