Is OEM or ODM service available?

Yes, both OEM and ODM services are available for this product.

What are the payment terms?

We accept LC, T/T, D/P, PayPal, and Western Union.

What is the lead time for shipment?

The average lead time is one month for both peak and off-peak seasons.

CE Standard Wood Chipper with 300mm Chipper Capacity (BX122R)

Name: CE Standard Wood Chipper with 300mm Chipper Capacity (BX122R)
Brand: Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2010336235

Jiangsu, ChinaChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

US$700.00-4,000.00

5 Pieces

Product profile

Customization

Available

After-sales Service

Yes

Automatic Grade

Semi-Automatic

Model NO.

BX122R

Warranty

1 Year

Feeding System

Hydraulic Feed

Transport Package

Steel Crate

Specification

CE Standard

Trademark

Kaideli

Origin

Changzhou, China

Production Capacity

50PCS/Month

Key features

Heavy Duty Rotor: Oversize rotor with faster tip speed powers through 6-inch diameter tree trunks.

Reversible Blades: Precision cut tool steel blades stay sharp and maximize chipping performance.

Hydraulic Feed System: Aggressive hydraulic feed hopper makes chipping effortless with rotating teeth.

360-Degree Discharge: Double adjustable chute swivels 360 degrees with adjustable top deflector.

High Output Force: Integrated twig breaker paddles ensure consistent chip size and 20-foot discharge.

CE Standard Certified: Meets CE safety standards for reliable agricultural operation.

One-Year Warranty: Covers all quality problems with prompt support and solution within one year.

Company profile

Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service AvailableExport Year: 2011-12-01 CertifiedNearest Port: Shanghai PortAverage Response Time: ≤2.94h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd. is a China-based limited company established in 2011, with operations in Jiangsu and manufacturing facilities in Changzhou. The supplier reports agricultural machinery and component manufacturing experience, five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, 90% export sales, and exports to approximately 30 countries. It claims CE certification for most popular products and describes service responsiveness, but no supplier management-system certification is recorded. Evidence indicates established production and export capability, with four years of R&D engineer experience and 11–20 quality-control staff reported. However, the available information does not sufficiently verify financial strength, customization capability, after-sales execution, or specific customer cases.

Supplier typeThe supplier is legally identified as a limited company and commercially described as both a manufacturing/processing machinery business and a trade company. Its stated products, factory, production lines, and manufacturing history support a combined manufacturing-and-trading profile rather than a purely trading operation.

CertificationsThe supplier states that it has CE certification for most popular products, indicating product-level certification coverage. However, supplier management-system certification is explicitly listed as NIL, so the evidence supports CE certification claims but not certified management systems.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports four years of R&D engineer experience, more than five technicians, and accumulated design and manufacturing experience in agricultural machinery and components. This supports some technical development capability, but there is no evidence of patents, new-product development records, or dedicated innovation systems.

Production capacityProduction capability is supported by five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, reported output of about 300 containers exported to 30 countries, and a one-month stated lead time in both peak and off-peak seasons. The slices also report more than 80 workers in one company description, while another record lists 58 employees; this inconsistency limits confidence in the exact workforce size but does not negate the evidence of operating production capacity.