What is the feeding system type for this chipper?

The feeding system can be either hydraulic or self-feeding.

How is the machine mounted to the tractor?

It uses a 3-point hitch mounting system for secure attachment.

Chinese Brand CE Certified Wood Chipper Shredder for Tree Branches

Name: Chinese Brand CE Certified Wood Chipper Shredder for Tree Branches
Brand: Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2137777435

Jiangsu, ChinaChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

US$699.00-3,999.00

5 Pieces

Product profile

Customization

Available

Warranty

1 Year

Trade Mark

Kaideli

Model NO.

BX122R

Model

Bx122r

Chipper Capacity

300mm/12"

Feeding System Feed

Hydraulic or Self

Mounting System

3 Point Hitch

Tractor HP

>=120HP

Transport Package

Steel Case

Specification

CE Certification

Trademark

Kaideli

Origin

Changzhou

Production Capacity

100 Sets Per Month

Key features

CE Certified Quality: Products hold CE certification, ensuring compliance with European safety standards.

One Year Warranty: Comprehensive one-year warranty coverage for all machines to guarantee reliability.

Custom OEM/ODM Service: Supports OEM and ODM services to produce machines according to specific customer requirements.

Hydraulic Feeding System: Equipped with hydraulic or self-feeding system for efficient wood chip processing.

3-Point Hitch Mounting: Designed with 3-point hitch mounting system for easy attachment to tractors >=120HP.

Professional Manufacturer: Established in 2010 with 80+ workers and 5+ technicians for quality and fast delivery.

Company profile

Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service AvailableExport Year: 2011-12-01 CertifiedNearest Port: Shanghai PortAverage Response Time: ≤2.04h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd. is a China-based limited company established in 2011, with operations in Jiangsu and manufacturing facilities in Changzhou. The supplier reports agricultural machinery and component manufacturing experience, five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, 90% export sales, and exports to approximately 30 countries. It claims CE certification for most popular products and describes service responsiveness, but no supplier management-system certification is recorded. Evidence indicates established production and export capability, with four years of R&D engineer experience and 11–20 quality-control staff reported. However, the available information does not sufficiently verify financial strength, customization capability, after-sales execution, or specific customer cases.

Supplier typeThe supplier is legally identified as a limited company and commercially described as both a manufacturing/processing machinery business and a trade company. Its stated products, factory, production lines, and manufacturing history support a combined manufacturing-and-trading profile rather than a purely trading operation.

CertificationsThe supplier states that it has CE certification for most popular products, indicating product-level certification coverage. However, supplier management-system certification is explicitly listed as NIL, so the evidence supports CE certification claims but not certified management systems.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports four years of R&D engineer experience, more than five technicians, and accumulated design and manufacturing experience in agricultural machinery and components. This supports some technical development capability, but there is no evidence of patents, new-product development records, or dedicated innovation systems.

Production capacityProduction capability is supported by five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, reported output of about 300 containers exported to 30 countries, and a one-month stated lead time in both peak and off-peak seasons. The slices also report more than 80 workers in one company description, while another record lists 58 employees; this inconsistency limits confidence in the exact workforce size but does not negate the evidence of operating production capacity.