What payment methods do you accept?

We accept LC, T/T, D/P, PayPal, and Western Union.

What is the lead time for production?

The average lead time is one month for both peak and off-peak seasons.

Depth Adjustable Grader Medium Tractor Grade Blade Rbb

Name: Depth Adjustable Grader Medium Tractor Grade Blade Rbb
Brand: Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.
SKU: 1944841541

Jiangsu, ChinaChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

US$299.00-499.00

5 Pieces

Product profile

Customization

Available

After-sales Service

1 Year Warranty

Warranty

1 Year

Model NO.

RBB

Certification

Condition

New

Application

Farmland

Transmission

Mechanical

Walking Mode

Tractor

Type

Medium-sized Grader

Power Required

15-50HP

Rippers

4-6

Digging Depth

35-125mm

Transport Package

Steel Crate

Specification

CE Standard

Trademark

Kaideli

Origin

Changzhou, China

Production Capacity

100 Sets Per Month

Key features

CE Certification: Product meets CE safety and quality standards for European markets.

1 Year Warranty: Comprehensive 1-year warranty coverage for mechanical defects.

OEM and ODM Services: Custom manufacturing solutions available with 4 R&D engineers.

Multiple Size Options: Available in 4FT, 5FT, and 6FT working widths (1200mm-1800mm).

Adjustable Digging Depth: Digging depth ranges from 35mm to 125mm for versatile farming.

Tractor Compatibility: Designed for medium tractors with 15-50HP power requirements.

Durable Construction: New condition with weights ranging from 190kg to 310kg.

Flexible Payment Terms: Accepts LC, T/T, D/P, PayPal, and Western Union.

Company profile

Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service AvailableExport Year: 2011-12-01 CertifiedNearest Port: Shanghai PortAverage Response Time: ≤4.11h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd. is a China-based limited company established in 2011, with operations in Jiangsu and manufacturing facilities in Changzhou. The supplier reports agricultural machinery and component manufacturing experience, five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, 90% export sales, and exports to approximately 30 countries. It claims CE certification for most popular products and describes service responsiveness, but no supplier management-system certification is recorded. Evidence indicates established production and export capability, with four years of R&D engineer experience and 11–20 quality-control staff reported. However, the available information does not sufficiently verify financial strength, customization capability, after-sales execution, or specific customer cases.

Supplier typeThe supplier is legally identified as a limited company and commercially described as both a manufacturing/processing machinery business and a trade company. Its stated products, factory, production lines, and manufacturing history support a combined manufacturing-and-trading profile rather than a purely trading operation.

CertificationsThe supplier states that it has CE certification for most popular products, indicating product-level certification coverage. However, supplier management-system certification is explicitly listed as NIL, so the evidence supports CE certification claims but not certified management systems.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports four years of R&D engineer experience, more than five technicians, and accumulated design and manufacturing experience in agricultural machinery and components. This supports some technical development capability, but there is no evidence of patents, new-product development records, or dedicated innovation systems.

Production capacityProduction capability is supported by five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, reported output of about 300 containers exported to 30 countries, and a one-month stated lead time in both peak and off-peak seasons. The slices also report more than 80 workers in one company description, while another record lists 58 employees; this inconsistency limits confidence in the exact workforce size but does not negate the evidence of operating production capacity.