What is the mounting system for this wood chipper?

It features a 3-point hitch mounting system compatible with tractors.

What certifications does the product hold?

The product holds CE certification for safety and quality.

What are the payment terms accepted?

Accepted payment terms include LC, T/T, D/P, PayPal, and Western Union.

Hydraulic Feed System Bx92RS Wood Chipper 252mm/10'' Chipper Capacity

Name: Hydraulic Feed System Bx92RS Wood Chipper 252mm/10'' Chipper Capacity
Brand: Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2009354895

Jiangsu, ChinaChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

US$700.00-2,500.00

5 Pieces

Product profile

Customization

Available

Type

Wood Chipper

Certification

Model NO.

BX92rs

Wood Chipper

Bx42, 62,Bx122r,ATS500

Transport Package

Steel Crates

Specification

CE Standard

Trademark

Kaideli

Origin

Changzhou, China

Production Capacity

100 Sets Per Month

Key features

Hydraulic Feed System: Efficient self-feeding hopper with hydraulic drive for BX92RS model.

360 Degree Discharge: Discharge hood rotates 360 degrees for flexible material placement.

CE Certified: Product meets European safety and quality standards.

OEM/ODM Service: Custom manufacturing services available for various models.

3-Point Hitch Mount: Compatible with standard tractor 3-point hitch systems.

High Capacity Chipping: Handles up to 250mm branches with 4 heavy-duty knives.

Tractor Power Range: Requires 70-120 HP tractor for optimal BX92RS performance.

Foldable Hopper Design: Compact folded dimensions for easy transport and storage.

Company profile

Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service AvailableExport Year: 2011-12-01 CertifiedNearest Port: Shanghai PortAverage Response Time: ≤3.37h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd. is a China-based limited company established in 2011, with operations in Jiangsu and manufacturing facilities in Changzhou. The supplier reports agricultural machinery and component manufacturing experience, five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, 90% export sales, and exports to approximately 30 countries. It claims CE certification for most popular products and describes service responsiveness, but no supplier management-system certification is recorded. Evidence indicates established production and export capability, with four years of R&D engineer experience and 11–20 quality-control staff reported. However, the available information does not sufficiently verify financial strength, customization capability, after-sales execution, or specific customer cases.

Supplier typeThe supplier is legally identified as a limited company and commercially described as both a manufacturing/processing machinery business and a trade company. Its stated products, factory, production lines, and manufacturing history support a combined manufacturing-and-trading profile rather than a purely trading operation.

CertificationsThe supplier states that it has CE certification for most popular products, indicating product-level certification coverage. However, supplier management-system certification is explicitly listed as NIL, so the evidence supports CE certification claims but not certified management systems.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports four years of R&D engineer experience, more than five technicians, and accumulated design and manufacturing experience in agricultural machinery and components. This supports some technical development capability, but there is no evidence of patents, new-product development records, or dedicated innovation systems.

Production capacityProduction capability is supported by five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, reported output of about 300 containers exported to 30 countries, and a one-month stated lead time in both peak and off-peak seasons. The slices also report more than 80 workers in one company description, while another record lists 58 employees; this inconsistency limits confidence in the exact workforce size but does not negate the evidence of operating production capacity.