What payment terms do you accept?

We accept LC, T/T, D/P, PayPal, and Western Union as payment methods.

Is the product certified?

Yes, the product meets the CE Standard for safety and quality assurance.

Mobile ATV Lawn Mower Gasoline Engine Towable Grass Cutting Machine with CE Approval

Name: Mobile ATV Lawn Mower Gasoline Engine Towable Grass Cutting Machine with CE Approval
Brand: Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.
SKU: 853746045

Jiangsu, ChinaChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

US$470.00-1,500.00

5 Pieces

Product profile

Customization

Available

Type

Rotary Mowers

Moving Way

Mount Type

Model NO.

ATFM120, 150

Cutter Type

Rotary Lawn Mower

Applicable Area

500-1000m²

Feature

2-Stroke, Steel Chassis

Certification

Cutter Kind

Straight Metal Blade

Mowing Requirements

Ground Type

Usage

Common Lawn

Finishing Mower

Atfm120, 150

Color

Customization

Logo

Customization

Transport Package

Steel Crates

Specification

CE Standard

Trademark

Kaideli

Origin

Changzhou, China

Production Capacity

50PCS/Month

Key features

Dual Model Options: Available in ATFM120 (1190mm width) and ATFM150 (1470mm width) for different needs.

High Power Engine: Both models equipped with 16hp 2-stroke engines for efficient cutting.

Durable Construction: Packed in steel crates for safe transport and long-term durability.

CE Certified: Meets CE safety standards ensuring compliance and reliability.

OEM Service Available: Custom manufacturing services provided for specific brand requirements.

Versatile Application: Ideal for finishing mowing on ATV, UTV, and Tractor implements.

Company profile

Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service AvailableExport Year: 2011-12-01 CertifiedNearest Port: Shanghai PortAverage Response Time: ≤4.07h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd. is a China-based limited company established in 2011, with operations in Jiangsu and manufacturing facilities in Changzhou. The supplier reports agricultural machinery and component manufacturing experience, five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, 90% export sales, and exports to approximately 30 countries. It claims CE certification for most popular products and describes service responsiveness, but no supplier management-system certification is recorded. Evidence indicates established production and export capability, with four years of R&D engineer experience and 11–20 quality-control staff reported. However, the available information does not sufficiently verify financial strength, customization capability, after-sales execution, or specific customer cases.

Supplier typeThe supplier is legally identified as a limited company and commercially described as both a manufacturing/processing machinery business and a trade company. Its stated products, factory, production lines, and manufacturing history support a combined manufacturing-and-trading profile rather than a purely trading operation.

CertificationsThe supplier states that it has CE certification for most popular products, indicating product-level certification coverage. However, supplier management-system certification is explicitly listed as NIL, so the evidence supports CE certification claims but not certified management systems.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports four years of R&D engineer experience, more than five technicians, and accumulated design and manufacturing experience in agricultural machinery and components. This supports some technical development capability, but there is no evidence of patents, new-product development records, or dedicated innovation systems.

Production capacityProduction capability is supported by five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, reported output of about 300 containers exported to 30 countries, and a one-month stated lead time in both peak and off-peak seasons. The slices also report more than 80 workers in one company description, while another record lists 58 employees; this inconsistency limits confidence in the exact workforce size but does not negate the evidence of operating production capacity.