What payment methods do you accept?

We accept LC, T/T, D/P, PayPal, and Western Union.

Where is your factory located?

Our factory is located in Changzhou city, Jiangsu province, China, about one hour from Shanghai by fast train.

Tractor Drive Rock Picker Stone Burier for Sale

Name: Tractor Drive Rock Picker Stone Burier for Sale
Brand: Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2146658045

Jiangsu, ChinaChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

Negotiable

5 Pieces

Product profile

Customization

Available

Warranty

1 Year

Certification

Model NO.

Application

Lawn

Cutting Height

10-80mm

Working Way

Rotary

Type

Tractor

Transport Package

Steel Case

Specification

CE Standard

Trademark

Kaideli

Origin

Changzhou, China

Production Capacity

100 Sets Per Month

Key features

One Year Warranty: All products come with a comprehensive one-year warranty covering mechanical defects.

CE Certified: Products meet CE safety standards for export to Europe, America, Australia, and South Africa.

Efficient Soil Preparation: Knocks stones underground and prepares tilled, aerated soil in a single pass.

Customizable Production: Machines can be produced according to specific customer requirements.

OEM and ODM Services: Full OEM and ODM support available for custom branding and design.

Fast Delivery: Short lead time of one month during both peak and off-peak seasons.

Multiple Models Available: Four models (SB 105-165) with tilling widths from 950mm to 1550mm.

Quality Testing: Every model undergoes rigorous testing before delivery to the port.

Company profile

Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service AvailableExport Year: 2011-12-01 CertifiedNearest Port: Shanghai PortAverage Response Time: ≤4.11h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd. is a China-based limited company established in 2011, with operations in Jiangsu and manufacturing facilities in Changzhou. The supplier reports agricultural machinery and component manufacturing experience, five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, 90% export sales, and exports to approximately 30 countries. It claims CE certification for most popular products and describes service responsiveness, but no supplier management-system certification is recorded. Evidence indicates established production and export capability, with four years of R&D engineer experience and 11–20 quality-control staff reported. However, the available information does not sufficiently verify financial strength, customization capability, after-sales execution, or specific customer cases.

Supplier typeThe supplier is legally identified as a limited company and commercially described as both a manufacturing/processing machinery business and a trade company. Its stated products, factory, production lines, and manufacturing history support a combined manufacturing-and-trading profile rather than a purely trading operation.

CertificationsThe supplier states that it has CE certification for most popular products, indicating product-level certification coverage. However, supplier management-system certification is explicitly listed as NIL, so the evidence supports CE certification claims but not certified management systems.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports four years of R&D engineer experience, more than five technicians, and accumulated design and manufacturing experience in agricultural machinery and components. This supports some technical development capability, but there is no evidence of patents, new-product development records, or dedicated innovation systems.

Production capacityProduction capability is supported by five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, reported output of about 300 containers exported to 30 countries, and a one-month stated lead time in both peak and off-peak seasons. The slices also report more than 80 workers in one company description, while another record lists 58 employees; this inconsistency limits confidence in the exact workforce size but does not negate the evidence of operating production capacity.