How long is the lead time?

The average lead time is one month, regardless of peak or off-peak seasons.

Are the machines tested before delivery?

Yes, every model of our machine is tested before delivery to the port.

What payment terms do you accept?

We accept LC, T/T, D/P, PayPal, and Western Union.

Tractor Mounted Box Scraper Blade Land Leveling Tool

Name: Tractor Mounted Box Scraper Blade Land Leveling Tool
Brand: Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2124597015

Jiangsu, ChinaChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

US$1,200.00-1,400.00

5 Pieces

Product profile

Customization

Available

Warranty

1 Year

Working Width

1200-1800mm

Model NO.

RBB

Digging Depth

35-125mm

Rippers

4-6tynes

Transport Package

Steel Case

Specification

CE Standard

Trademark

kaideli

Origin

Changzhou, China

Production Capacity

100 Sets Per Month

Key features

Customizable Working Width: Available in 1200mm, 1500mm, and 1800mm to suit different needs.

Adjustable Digging Depth: Depth ranges from 35mm to 125mm for versatile soil conditions.

Variable Ripper Options: Select from 4, 5, or 6 tynes based on specific requirements.

One Year Warranty: Comprehensive warranty coverage for all mechanical parts.

CE Certified Quality: Most popular products hold CE certification for safety standards.

OEM and ODM Services: Full customization available according to customer requirements.

Factory Direct Pricing: Complete production equipment ensures short lead times and better prices.

Pre-Delivery Testing: Every model undergoes rigorous testing before shipping.

Company profile

Changzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service AvailableExport Year: 2011-12-01 CertifiedNearest Port: Shanghai PortAverage Response Time: ≤2.53h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryChangzhou Kaideli Machinery Co., Ltd. is a China-based limited company established in 2011, with operations in Jiangsu and manufacturing facilities in Changzhou. The supplier reports agricultural machinery and component manufacturing experience, five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, 90% export sales, and exports to approximately 30 countries. It claims CE certification for most popular products and describes service responsiveness, but no supplier management-system certification is recorded. Evidence indicates established production and export capability, with four years of R&D engineer experience and 11–20 quality-control staff reported. However, the available information does not sufficiently verify financial strength, customization capability, after-sales execution, or specific customer cases.

Supplier typeThe supplier is legally identified as a limited company and commercially described as both a manufacturing/processing machinery business and a trade company. Its stated products, factory, production lines, and manufacturing history support a combined manufacturing-and-trading profile rather than a purely trading operation.

CertificationsThe supplier states that it has CE certification for most popular products, indicating product-level certification coverage. However, supplier management-system certification is explicitly listed as NIL, so the evidence supports CE certification claims but not certified management systems.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports four years of R&D engineer experience, more than five technicians, and accumulated design and manufacturing experience in agricultural machinery and components. This supports some technical development capability, but there is no evidence of patents, new-product development records, or dedicated innovation systems.

Production capacityProduction capability is supported by five production lines, a 6,510.57 m² manufacturing plant, reported output of about 300 containers exported to 30 countries, and a one-month stated lead time in both peak and off-peak seasons. The slices also report more than 80 workers in one company description, while another record lists 58 employees; this inconsistency limits confidence in the exact workforce size but does not negate the evidence of operating production capacity.