DSL Colorless High-Purity CO2 for Power Plant Emissions

Name: DSL Colorless High-Purity CO2 for Power Plant Emissions
Brand: Nanjing Deshilan Technology Co., Ltd
SKU: 2135141262

Jiangsu, ChinaNanjing Deshilan Technology Co., Ltd

US$240.00-280.00

1 Ton

Sample price:US$1.00/kg.Request sample

Product profile

CAS No.

124-38-9

Formula

CO2

EINECS

204-696-9

Constituent

Industrial Pure Air

Grade Standard

Industrial Grade

Chemical Property

Inflammable Gas

Filling Pressure

150 Bar-200 Bar

Appearance

Colorless, Non-Flammable, Liquefied and Odorless

Valve

Qf-35c / Qf-2A / Cga 320 / Cga 580

Transport Package

40L-50L / 2000L

Specification

99.9%~99.999%

Trademark

DSL

Origin

China

HS Code

2811210000

Production Capacity

1000 PCS Per Month

Company profile

Nanjing Deshilan Technology Co., LtdJiangsu, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading Company, Group CorporationNearest Port: Shanghai, Qingdao, NingboAverage Response Time: ≤24hTerms of Payment: Money Gram, Small-amount payment, LC, etc.International Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, CIP, EXW, CPT, Others, CFR, CIF, FCA, DAT, FAS, DDP, DAP

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier presents itself as responsibility- and integrity-oriented and states that it provides products and services from Nanjing Jiangbei New Area. However, the evidence shows major capability gaps: no supplier management-system certification, no warehouse quality-control process found, one quality-control employee, no quality-control testing equipment, and no written procedures for supplier assessment, corrective actions, or complaint handling. It reports no inventory, overseas warehouse, overseas showroom, overseas agent or branch, or overseas service countries, and has not participated in offline trade shows. Lead times are stated as within 15 workdays in both peak and off-season, while quality assurance and raw-material traceability are reported. The supplier claims OEM service for well-known brands but does not offer ODM or SDK-supported R&D. Financial information provided is limited and reports zero values across the stated periods; monetary figures are omitted here as required.

Supplier typeThe supplier describes itself as providing products and services and reports OEM service for well-known brands. It does not provide ODM services, so the available evidence supports an OEM-oriented supplier classification rather than an ODM provider.

CertificationsThe supplier management-system certification field is explicitly recorded as NIL. No certification evidence is provided, so this field is not demonstrated as an advantage.

After-Sales capabilityAfter-sales support is assigned to one R&D engineer, but the supplier has no inventory, overseas warehouse, overseas showroom, overseas agents or branches, and no overseas service countries. It also lacks written procedures for complaint handling, corrective and preventive actions, and service-capability assessment, although it states that quality assurance and raw-material traceability exist.

Financial creditThe supplied financial records report zero values for revenues, margins, profits, costs, cash inflows, and cash outflows across the stated one-, two-, and three-year periods. This provides no positive evidence of operating scale or financial strength and indicates a significant credibility concern in the submitted data.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports one R&D engineer whose stated responsibility is after-sales service support, no ODM service, and no available SDK. The evidence does not show product-development resources or independent innovation capability.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly reports OEM capability for well-known brands, which supports manufacturing to customer or brand specifications. However, it explicitly does not provide ODM services, limiting evidence for design-led customization.