Reliable Haitian 470 Ton Injection Molding Machine with Servo Technology

Name: Reliable Haitian 470 Ton Injection Molding Machine with Servo Technology
Brand: Dirma Machinery (Dongguan) Co., Ltd
SKU: 2292781545

Guangdong, ChinaDirma Machinery (Dongguan) Co., Ltd

US$25,200.00-26,600.00

1 Piece

Product profile

Customization

Available

After-sales Service

Services Are Available Upon Request

Warranty

1 Year

Model NO.

Haitian MA III 470T

Type

Injection Blow Molding

Structure

Horizontal

Plastic Type

Thermoplastic

Plasticizing Way

Screw Type

Clamping Way

Hydraulic

Automation

Automatic

Computerized

Certification

CE, ISO9001:2008, GMP, QS

Clamp Tonnage

4700kN

Screw Diameter a

70mm

Screw Diameter B

80mm

Screw Diameter C

90mm

Transport Package

Plastic Wrap Film Packaging

Specification

8.1m*2.05m*2.7m

Trademark

Haitian

Origin

The Chinese Mainland

HS Code

84771000

Production Capacity

100

Company profile

Fast DeliveryLow MOQQA/QC Inspectors100% Finished Products Inspection

Dirma Machinery (Dongguan) Co., Ltd

Guangdong, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Other, Group CorporationExport Year: 2019-08-21Nearest Port: Shenzhen port, shekou, Nansha portAverage Response Time: ≤3.00hTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, Western Union, etc.International Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, EXW, CFR, CIF, DDP, FCA

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier appears to be a second-hand injection molding machine provider offering equipment sales, repair, leasing, installation, commissioning, maintenance, and technical consultation. It reports OEM service for well-known brands and describes experienced after-sales technicians, including a stated target of on-site support within 24 hours for equipment failures. ISO 9001, BREEAM, and QC 080000 certifications are listed, along with 21–30 years of R&D engineer experience, 11–20 quality-control staff, and reported output of 500 used injection molding machines annually. However, it has no overseas showroom, agents, branches, or offline trade-show participation, and offers no SDK. R&D documentation and patents are absent, while supplier-service corrective-action and complaint-handling procedures lack written records. Evidence of named customer cases is not provided.

Supplier typeThe supplier’s stated scope covers mechanical equipment, equipment repair, sales of mechanical and electrical products, leasing, and related services. Its company description specifically identifies second-hand injection molding machine sales together with installation, commissioning, maintenance, and technical consultation, indicating an equipment supplier and service provider rather than a pure manufacturer.

CertificationsThe supplier lists ISO 9001, BREEAM, and QC 080000 certifications under its supplier-management systems. These certifications are explicit evidence of certification holdings, although the slices do not provide certificate numbers, validity dates, or scope details.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier states that experienced after-sales professionals can respond promptly and provide on-site support within 24 hours for equipment failures, and it offers installation, debugging, maintenance, and technical consultation. However, it reports no overseas showroom, agent, branch, or overseas service country, while complaint handling and corrective/preventive actions have no written procedures or records; therefore, capability is evidenced mainly for direct service, with documented-service-system weaknesses.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports R&D engineers with responsibilities for developing products according to customer and market requirements and lists CAD as an R&D software instrument. Conversely, it has no SDK, no R&D patents, and no available design-input, output, review, verification, or validation documentation, indicating limited documented innovation evidence.

Production capacityThe supplier reports 21–30 years of total R&D engineer experience, 11–20 quality-control staff, and annual output information of 500 used injection molding machines. These figures provide explicit evidence of operational and quality-control capacity, although the supplied information does not independently verify the output.

Customization capabilityOEM service for well-known brands is explicitly reported, and R&D responsibilities include developing new products according to customer and market requirements. However, the absence of an SDK, patents, and auditable R&D design documentation limits evidence of broad or technically sophisticated customization.