Can you give me a discount?

Of course, we will offer you the best discount according to the quantity of your order.

Where is your shipping port?

Tianjin port,Qingdao port,Ningbo port and Shanghai port.

Premium SBR Powder for Enhanced Asphalt Durability and Performance

Name: Premium SBR Powder for Enhanced Asphalt Durability and Performance
Brand: Donghongyue (Shandong) International Trade Co., Ltd
SKU: 2116937502

Shandong, ChinaDonghongyue (Shandong) International Trade Co., Ltd

US$1,210.00-1,300.00

1 Ton

Sample price:US$20.00/kg.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Appearance

Powder

Solid Content

50%±2

Model NO.

QL-1

Purpose

Asphalt Modifier

Transport Package

Carton

Specification

37cm*37cm*37cm

Trademark

qiaolong

Origin

China

HS Code

4002119000

Production Capacity

22000piece/Years

Key features

High Performance Elastomer: Polymerized from butadiene and styrene with excellent low and high temperature resistance.

Asphalt Compatibility: Good compatibility with road asphalt, fast bonding, and flexible proportioning for waterproofing.

Customization Available: Appearance is customizable as powder; other monomers can be grafted for specific purposes.

Quality Assurance: Independent intellectual property rights with random inspection for finished products.

Flexible Ordering: Samples available for testing before order; discounts offered based on order quantity.

Company profile

Importers and Exporters

Donghongyue (Shandong) International Trade Co., Ltd

Shandong, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service Available CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Samples, Flexible customization, etc. CertifiedExport Year: Less than 1 year CertifiedNearest Port: Qingdao PortAverage Response Time: ≤1.14h

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier operates across waterproofing materials, rubber-related products, mechanical equipment, textiles, chemicals, building materials, and selected medical supplies. It states that it provides OEM services for well-known brands and reports multiple technical patents and ISO9001 certification. Quality assurance and raw-material traceability are identified, but the available evidence also shows no SDK, no inventory, no overseas warehouse or showroom, no valid manufacturing-capacity contract with related subcontractors, and no documented corrective-action or complaint-handling procedures. Lead time is stated as within 15 working days in both peak and off-season, but supplier-service governance documentation is incomplete. Financial records are referenced for 2022–2024, without sufficient detail to assess credibility. R&D resources are limited in the evidence, with one engineer and no available design-control documentation.

CertificationsThe company states that it has passed ISO9001 quality management system certification and holds multiple technical patents. This is explicit evidence of certification and technical recognition, although no certificate number, validity period, or certification scope is provided.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier states that it has no overseas warehouse or showroom, and it has no written procedures or records for corrective and preventive actions or effective customer-complaint handling. These documented gaps indicate weakly evidenced after-sales service infrastructure.

Production capacityThe supplier reports no valid manufacturing-capacity contract with its related subcontractors and no in-stock capacity. It states an average lead time within 15 working days in both peak and off-season, but service-capability governance lacks written assessment procedures and an approved-supplier list. Overall production capacity is not sufficiently substantiated and includes explicit control gaps.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly states that it provides OEM services for well-known brands and offers products intended to meet varied customer demands. Quality assurance and raw-material traceability are also reported, but the absence of an SDK and formal R&D audit documentation limits evidence for technically complex customization.