Diamond Arix Segment Wall Saw Blade for Concrete and Masonry Cutting

Name: Diamond Arix Segment Wall Saw Blade for Concrete and Masonry Cutting
Brand: Shijiazhuang Dowell Technology Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2251827705

Hebei, ChinaShijiazhuang Dowell Technology Co., Ltd.

US$180.00

1 Piece

Product specifications

Diameter

Product profile

Blade Type

Wall Saw Blade

Manufacturing Process

Laser Welded

Application

Concrete, Reinforced Concrete, Brick Wall, Masonry

Model NO.

DWWSYR800A

Segment Type

Arix Segment

Bore

60mm/50mm/35mm

Segment Height

10mm

Equipment

Electirc/Hydraulic Wall Saw

Package

Pallet / Wooden Case

Segment Length

24mm

Segment Thickness

4.0-5.0mm

Cutting Method

Wet

Welding Method

Laser Welded

Diameter

500-1600mm

Segment Design

Arix Pattern for Smooth Cutting

Transport Package

Cartoon / Pallet

Specification

800mm-1200mm

Trademark

Dowell Technology

Origin

Shijizhuang

HS Code

8202391000

Production Capacity

10000PCS/Year

Company profile

Importers and ExportersHigh Repeat Buyers Choice

Shijiazhuang Dowell Technology Co., Ltd.

Hebei, China

Business Type: Trading Company CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Samples CertifiedExport Year: 5years CertifiedNearest Port: Tianjin PortAverage Response Time: ≤15h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, D/P, T/T, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier’s registered scope covers technical services and trading across hardware, electrical, mechanical, plastic, rubber, automotive, electronic, metal, daily-use, building-material, medical-device, chemical, and import/export categories. However, the provided assessment shows limited formal management infrastructure: no written supplier-service procedures, corrective/preventive-action records, or complaint-handling procedures; no management-system certifications; and no overseas warehouses, showrooms, agents, branches, or offline trade-show participation. R&D evidence is weak, with no new products in the past year, no ODM, OEM for popular brands, or SDK availability, and only one year of R&D-engineer experience reported. Financial records provided show zero operating revenue, costs, profit, and cash-flow amounts for the stated periods, which does not establish financial strength. A lead time of within 15 working days and export-market coverage in Southeast Asia/Mideast and Europe are stated, but...

Supplier typeThe supplier presents a broad technical-service and trading scope, including hardware, machinery, electrical equipment, multiple material categories, automotive and electronic products, medical devices, chemicals, and import/export activities. The available evidence supports classifying it as a diversified trading and technical-services supplier rather than confirming it as a manufacturer.

CertificationsThe supplier’s certification of management systems is explicitly recorded as NIL. This is a stated absence of certification evidence for this field.

After-Sales capabilityThere are no written procedures or records for effective supplier-service assessment, corrective and preventive actions, or customer-complaint handling. The supplier also reports no overseas warehouse, showroom, agent/branch, or offline trade-show capability, indicating limited documented after-sales and overseas service infrastructure.

Financial creditThe supplied financial records report zero operating revenue, operating cost, gross profit, operating profit, cash received, cash inflows, and cash outflows for the stated periods. These figures do not demonstrate financial strength and create a material concern about operating activity, although the records alone do not establish the reason for the reported zeros.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports no new products during the past year, no ODM service, no SDK, and no OEM service for popular brands. It also reports no ERP-based digital management and provides zero values for listed sustainable-development and technical-transformation capabilities, so the evidence does not support meaningful innovation capability.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly reports no ODM service and no OEM capability for popular brands. Because ODM/OEM are directly relevant customization indicators, the available evidence shows a stated deficiency in customization capability.