1650 Plasma Cutting Torch System

Name: 220953 Retaining Cap Suitable for Hypertherm Pmx65/85/105/125/1250/1650 Plasma Cutting Torch System
Brand: Weifang Royalroad Trading Co., Ltd.
SKU: 737024962

Shandong, ChinaWeifang Royalroad Trading Co., Ltd.

US$0.50-1.00

50 Pieces

Sample price:US$25.00/piece.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Maximum Welding Thickness

32mm

Application

Machinery

Model NO.

220953

Combustible Gas

Air

Flame Number

Single Flame

Size

Standard

Type

Plasma Cutting

Cutting Material

Mild Steel, Iron, Aluminum, Metal Alloy

Suitable for

Powermax 65, Powermax 85, Powermax 105

Current

45-105A, Ohmic

Ref No.

220953

Transport Package

Paper Carton

Specification

Materials: Dupont High-polymer, copper alloy

Trademark

easyweld

Origin

China

HS Code

8515900000

Production Capacity

1000PCS/Month

Key features

Wide Compatibility: Suitable for Powermax 65, 85, and 105 plasma cutting torch systems.

Customizable Materials: Designed for cutting Mild Steel, Iron, Aluminum, and Metal Alloys.

High Performance: Delivers high-density plasma cutting for faster and cleaner cuts.

Long-Term Experience: Over 20 years of experience in welding and cutting consumables and equipment.

Factory Direct Supply: Manufactured directly by our own factories in Shandong and Jiangsu provinces.

Fast Production: Mass production typically takes 15 workdays after order confirmation.

Sample Availability: Free samples available; customer covers freight costs.

Company profile

Weifang Royalroad Trading Co., Ltd.

Shandong, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading CompanyExport Year: 2000-05-01Nearest Port: QINGDAO, SHANGHAIAverage Response Time: ≤0.27hTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, Western Union, etc.International Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, CFR, CIF, EXW

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryWeifang Royalroad Trading Co., Ltd. is identified as a China-based limited trading company and manufacturer/factory operating in Shandong. The supplier reports more than 20 years of plasma-cutting technology experience, four production lines, six to ten quality-control staff, ISO 9000 and ISO 9001 management-system certifications, and self-operated import/export rights. Its stated capabilities include plasma and welding consumables, technical support, product training, custom packaging, and claimed on-time delivery. However, R&D engineer experience is listed as under five years, customer evidence is limited to one recorded trade transaction and one associated buyer, and the provided data does not establish financial strength or independently verify operational claims.

Supplier typeThe supplier is described as both a trading company and manufacturer/factory, with a limited-company structure and specialization in plasma-cutting and welding products. Its stated self-operated import/export rights and 90% export-sales share indicate substantial international trading activity.

CertificationsThe supplier explicitly reports ISO 9000 and ISO 9001 certifications and describes ISO-certified production processes with a zero-defect objective. The slices do not provide certificate numbers, issuing bodies, or validity dates, but they do constitute stated evidence of certification holding.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier claims responsive customer service, technical support, product training, prompt professional assistance, and service excellence. These are explicit service commitments, but the slices do not document actual after-sales cases, service response metrics, or warranty arrangements.

Production capacityThe supplier presents itself as a specialized manufacturer with over 20 years of plasma-cutting experience, four production lines, six to ten quality-control staff, and a factory location in Shandong. These details explicitly support established production capability, although actual capacity utilization and independent verification are not provided.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly claims custom packaging solutions and states that it provides technical support and product training. The evidence supports packaging-related customization, but it does not confirm broader engineering customization, minimum-order requirements, or examples of customized products.