What payment terms are accepted?

We accept LC, T/T, Western Union, and small-amount payments.

Super 400 Plus Plasma Cutter Torch Consumables Ew40020503 Outer Cap

Name: Super 400 Plus Plasma Cutter Torch Consumables Ew40020503 Outer Cap
Brand: Weifang Royalroad Trading Co., Ltd.
SKU: 735398922

Shandong, ChinaWeifang Royalroad Trading Co., Ltd.

US$0.50-1.00

50 Pieces

Sample price:US$18.00/piece.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Certification

CE, ISO9001

Maximum Welding Thickness

>15mm

Model NO.

EW40020503

Application

Machinery

Combustible Gas

Air

Flame Number

Single Flame

Size

Standard

Type

Plasma Cutting

Suitable for

Koike Super 400 Plus

Transport Package

Paper Carton

Specification

high polymer material

Trademark

easyweld

Origin

China

HS Code

8515900000

Production Capacity

10000PCS/Month

Key features

Surpassing OEM Quality: Unparalleled expertise in gas flow mechanics and airflow dynamics for superior performance.

High Density Plasma Cuts: Brings high density plasma cutting to standard equipment for faster and cleaner cuts.

15+ Years Experience: Over 15 years of professional experience in producing welding torches and consumables.

CE & ISO9001 Certified: Products meet international standards with CE and ISO9001 certifications.

Compatible with Koike: Specifically suitable for Koike Super 400 Plus plasma cutting torches.

Wider Thickness Capacity: Capable of welding and cutting materials with a maximum thickness greater than 15mm.

Company profile

Weifang Royalroad Trading Co., Ltd.

Shandong, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading CompanyExport Year: 2000-05-01Nearest Port: QINGDAO, SHANGHAIAverage Response Time: ≤0.43hTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, Western Union, etc.International Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, CFR, CIF, EXW

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryWeifang Royalroad Trading Co., Ltd. is identified as a China-based limited trading company and manufacturer/factory operating in Shandong. The supplier reports more than 20 years of plasma-cutting technology experience, four production lines, six to ten quality-control staff, ISO 9000 and ISO 9001 management-system certifications, and self-operated import/export rights. Its stated capabilities include plasma and welding consumables, technical support, product training, custom packaging, and claimed on-time delivery. However, R&D engineer experience is listed as under five years, customer evidence is limited to one recorded trade transaction and one associated buyer, and the provided data does not establish financial strength or independently verify operational claims.

Supplier typeThe supplier is described as both a trading company and manufacturer/factory, with a limited-company structure and specialization in plasma-cutting and welding products. Its stated self-operated import/export rights and 90% export-sales share indicate substantial international trading activity.

CertificationsThe supplier explicitly reports ISO 9000 and ISO 9001 certifications and describes ISO-certified production processes with a zero-defect objective. The slices do not provide certificate numbers, issuing bodies, or validity dates, but they do constitute stated evidence of certification holding.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier claims responsive customer service, technical support, product training, prompt professional assistance, and service excellence. These are explicit service commitments, but the slices do not document actual after-sales cases, service response metrics, or warranty arrangements.

Production capacityThe supplier presents itself as a specialized manufacturer with over 20 years of plasma-cutting experience, four production lines, six to ten quality-control staff, and a factory location in Shandong. These details explicitly support established production capability, although actual capacity utilization and independent verification are not provided.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly claims custom packaging solutions and states that it provides technical support and product training. The evidence supports packaging-related customization, but it does not confirm broader engineering customization, minimum-order requirements, or examples of customized products.