SummaryThe supplier is identified as Hebei Erye Rubber and Plastic Co., Ltd., a China-based limited company in Hebei. The records describe both manufacturer/factory and trading-company classifications, with products including custom plastic, rubber, and PU parts, molds, molding parts, gaskets, pulleys, and rollers. ISO 9001 certification is reported, while service procedures and corrective-action processes exist without written records. Financial-related records identify years but provide no assessable financial results. Innovation evidence is limited: two R&D engineers, no available SDK, and no new products launched in the previous year. The supplier reports broad customization capability and a 30,000-square-meter production facility with automated molding technologies. No Fortune 500 customer collaborations are reported, and customer-case evidence is otherwise insufficient.
CertificationsISO 9001 certification is explicitly reported. The provided information does not identify the certificate scope, issuing body, validity period, or any additional certifications.
R&D capabilityThe supplier reports two R&D engineers, but no SDK availability and no new products launched in the previous year. These facts show some R&D staffing but limited demonstrated recent innovation output.
Production capacityThe supplier is identified as a manufacturer/factory offering multiple molding and custom-part categories. Its company description states that the facility covers 30,000 square meters and uses automated molding technologies for small and large orders; an SGS audit was conducted, although the recorded audit result is 0 and the report validity ended on 2025-05-24.
Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly reports customization from samples, designs, full customization, minor customization, and flexible customization. Its listed products include custom plastic, rubber, and PU parts, and its description emphasizes custom parts supported by automated molding technologies.
Client casesThe supplier reports no collaboration with Fortune 500 companies and provides no named customer cases in the available records. A repeat-buyer preference of 50%~80% is reported, but this alone does not establish specific customer references or verified case studies.