Dijital Label Roll Printing Machine Portable Inkjet Coding Machine Inkjet Printer 6 Lines

Name: Dijital Label Roll Printing Machine Portable Inkjet Coding Machine Inkjet Printer 6 Lines
Brand: Guangzhou Fuluke Cosmetics Equipment Co., Ltd.
SKU: 1903498095

Guangdong, ChinaGuangzhou Fuluke Cosmetics Equipment Co., Ltd.

US$3,858.00

1 Set

Product profile

Customization

Available

Type

Continuous Jet Type Coding Machine

Usage

Daily Industrial, Chemical Products, Drug, Food

Model NO.

FPM

Automatic Grade

Automatic

Principle of Classification

Continue Ink Jet Printer

Application of Classification

Ink Jet Printer

Working Patterns

Customsized

Supplies

Ink

Packaging

Box

Model Number

Dijital Label Roll Printing Machine Portable Inkje

Voltage

220/380

After-Sales Service Provided

Engineers Available to Service

Used for Industry

Cosmetic, Chemical, Pharmacy

Wieght

41kg

Size

330*260*580mm

Transport Package

Standard Export Wooden Packing

Specification

Stainless Steel

Trademark

Guangzhou FULUKE

Origin

Yangzhou City

HS Code

8479820090

Production Capacity

100sets/Month

Company profile

High Repeat Buyers ChoiceODM ServicesOEM ServicesProduct Certification

Guangzhou Fuluke Cosmetics Equipment Co., Ltd.

Guangdong, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service Available CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Samples, Customization from Designs, etc. CertifiedExport Year: 15 years CertifiedNearest Port: Guangzhou portAverage Response Time: ≤4.82h

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is a combined company located in Guangzhou, China, with one production line, 11–20 quality-control staff, four R&D engineers, and stated annual output in the reported range. It offers extensive customization, ODM and OEM services, has launched new products within the past year, and holds CE certification. Export experience is reported at 15 years, with 41%–50% of sales from exports and access to Guangzhou port. However, the supplier has no available SDK, no effective written procedures or records for service assessment, corrective actions, or complaint handling, and no valid manufacturing-capacity contract with related subcontractors. Financial credibility cannot be fully assessed because the provided financial entries identify years rather than financial results. Customer evidence is mixed: repeat buyers account for 50%–80%, but there is no cooperation with Fortune 500 companies.

CertificationsThe supplier reports CE certification for product compliance and sustainable development/product certification capability. No additional certifications or certification scope details are provided.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier reports no written procedures or followed records for service-capability assessment, corrective and preventive actions, or effective complaint handling. It has inventory capability but no overseas warehouse or showroom, indicating limitations in documented after-sales processes and overseas support infrastructure.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports four R&D engineers, new products launched within the past year, ODM services, and multiple design-customization options. However, it has no available SDK, so its innovation support is demonstrated mainly through product development and design services rather than SDK-based integration.

Production capacityThe supplier operates one production line, has 11–20 quality-control staff, maintains inventory capability, and reports finished-product inspection instructions that are uniformly followed. It also reports lead times of within 15 workdays to one month in both peak and off-seasons, but lacks a valid manufacturing-capacity contract with related subcontractors.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly offers customization from samples, customization from designs, full customization, minor customization, and flexible customization. It also reports ODM capability, providing direct evidence of broad customization support.

Client casesThe supplier reports OEM services for well-known brands and a repeat-buyer preference of 50%–80%. However, it reports no cooperation with Fortune 500 companies, and no specific customer names or verifiable case details are provided.