Guangzhou Fuluke Liquid Wash Mixing Machine Soap Making Machine

Name: Guangzhou Fuluke Liquid Wash Mixing Machine Soap Making Machine
Brand: Guangzhou Fuluke Cosmetics Equipment Co., Ltd.
SKU: 816213255

Guangdong, ChinaGuangzhou Fuluke Cosmetics Equipment Co., Ltd.

US$2,500.00-18,900.00

1 Piece

Product profile

Customization

Available

Additional Capabilities

Milling

Application

Liquid with Suspended Solids, Viscous Fluid, Liquid, Liquid

Model NO.

FMC

Application Area

Daily Chemical

Certification

CE, ISO, GMP

Condition

New

Mixing Drum Shape

Drum

Stirring Type

Gravity

Warranty

1year

Working

High Speed Mixer

Name

Guangzhou Fuluke Liquid Wash Mixing Machine Soap M

Materials

Stainless Steel 316L / 304

Heating Way

Steam / Electric

Mixing Speed

0-65r/Min

Homogenizer Speed

0-3300r/Min

Mixer Type

Homogenizer

Layout Type

Verticle

Operating Type

Continuous Operating

Transport Package

Wooden Case

Specification

Accoeding to the size of mixing tank

Trademark

FULUKE

Origin

Guangzhou China

HS Code

8474900000

Production Capacity

30set Month

Company profile

High Repeat Buyers ChoiceODM ServicesOEM ServicesProduct Certification

Guangzhou Fuluke Cosmetics Equipment Co., Ltd.

Guangdong, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service Available CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Samples, Customization from Designs, etc. CertifiedExport Year: 15 years CertifiedNearest Port: Guangzhou portAverage Response Time: ≤5.16h

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is a combined company located in Guangzhou, China, with one production line, 11–20 quality-control staff, four R&D engineers, and stated annual output in the reported range. It offers extensive customization, ODM and OEM services, has launched new products within the past year, and holds CE certification. Export experience is reported at 15 years, with 41%–50% of sales from exports and access to Guangzhou port. However, the supplier has no available SDK, no effective written procedures or records for service assessment, corrective actions, or complaint handling, and no valid manufacturing-capacity contract with related subcontractors. Financial credibility cannot be fully assessed because the provided financial entries identify years rather than financial results. Customer evidence is mixed: repeat buyers account for 50%–80%, but there is no cooperation with Fortune 500 companies.

CertificationsThe supplier reports CE certification for product compliance and sustainable development/product certification capability. No additional certifications or certification scope details are provided.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier reports no written procedures or followed records for service-capability assessment, corrective and preventive actions, or effective complaint handling. It has inventory capability but no overseas warehouse or showroom, indicating limitations in documented after-sales processes and overseas support infrastructure.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports four R&D engineers, new products launched within the past year, ODM services, and multiple design-customization options. However, it has no available SDK, so its innovation support is demonstrated mainly through product development and design services rather than SDK-based integration.

Production capacityThe supplier operates one production line, has 11–20 quality-control staff, maintains inventory capability, and reports finished-product inspection instructions that are uniformly followed. It also reports lead times of within 15 workdays to one month in both peak and off-seasons, but lacks a valid manufacturing-capacity contract with related subcontractors.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly offers customization from samples, customization from designs, full customization, minor customization, and flexible customization. It also reports ODM capability, providing direct evidence of broad customization support.

Client casesThe supplier reports OEM services for well-known brands and a repeat-buyer preference of 50%–80%. However, it reports no cooperation with Fortune 500 companies, and no specific customer names or verifiable case details are provided.