Best Price Glycol Butyl Ether CAS 29387-86-8 Pnb

Name: Best Price Glycol Butyl Ether CAS 29387-86-8 Pnb
Brand: Shijiazhuang Randa Technology Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2199628795

Hebei, ChinaShijiazhuang Randa Technology Co., Ltd.

US$30.00

100-499 kg

US$20.00

500+ kg

Sample price:US$50.00/kg.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

CAS No.

29387-86-8

Formula

CH3(CH2)N(Och2CH2)Poso3nh4

Model NO.

29387-86-8

EINECS

218-793-9

Certification

SDS

Purity

99%

Type

Sodium Sulfate

Appearance

Liquid

Grade Standard

Industrial Grade

Product Name

29387-86-8

Selling Units

Single Item

Active Content (Mmw=423)

6.0 ~ 7.0

Origin.

Hebei

Transport Package

Plastic Bucket or IBC

Specification

170KG/brum

Trademark

RANDA

Origin

Hebei

Production Capacity

5000tons

Company profile

Importers and ExportersQuality AssuranceR&D CapabilitiesRaw Materials Reports

Shijiazhuang Randa Technology Co., Ltd.

Hebei, China

Business Type: Trading Company CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Samples CertifiedExport Year: 3years CertifiedNearest Port: Tianjin Port, Qingdao PortAverage Response Time: ≤6.86h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is identified as a trading company with stated business coverage in technical services and new-energy products, while its company description also presents substantial coconut-based surfactant production facilities. It reports ISO 9001:2015 certification and quality controls including raw-material traceability, but complaint handling and service corrective-action procedures lack written records. Production information states large annual outputs for LABSA, CDEA and SLES, with lead times within 15 working days in both off-peak and peak seasons. International service infrastructure is limited: no inventory, overseas warehouse, showroom, agent or branch is reported. Innovation and customization evidence is weak because no new product was developed in the past year and ODM, branded OEM and SDK services are unavailable. Financial information is limited to reporting-year labels without performance figures, so credibility cannot be determined. No customer cases are provided.

Supplier typeThe supplier is explicitly classified as a trading company, while its stated scope covers technical services, technology development and sales of new-energy products. This indicates a trading-oriented entity with broad technology and product-sales activities, but the slices do not clearly reconcile this classification with the separate production claims.

CertificationsThe supplier states that its factory is ISO 9001:2015 certified and describes quality management systems and strict production processes. However, supplier-management-system certification is recorded as NIL, so the evidence supports factory quality certification but not broader supplier-management certification.

After-Sales capabilityService lead time is stated as within 15 working days, but there are no written procedures or records for service-capability assessment, corrective and preventive actions, or effective customer-complaint handling. The supplier also reports no inventory, overseas warehouse, showroom, agent or branch capability, indicating limited documented and overseas after-sales infrastructure.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports an advanced R&D center and one year of R&D-engineer experience, but also states that no new product was developed in the past year and that no SDK is available. These findings provide limited support for current innovation output and do not establish strong innovation capability.

Production capacityThe supplier describes advanced production facilities, an ISO 9001:2015-certified factory and large stated annual outputs of LABSA, CDEA and SLES, with lead times within 15 working days in both off-peak and peak seasons. The evidence supports substantial stated production capacity, although the slices do not independently verify the output figures.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly states that it does not provide ODM services and does not perform OEM services for popular brands. This is direct evidence of limited customization and branded contract-manufacturing capability.