What protocols does the tag support?

It supports ISO/IEC 18000-6c and EPC Class1 Gen2 protocols.

What are the memory specifications?

It features 96-bit EPC storage and 512 bits of user memory.

Passive RFID UHF 18000-6c Remote Identification Rubber Tire Label

Name: Passive RFID UHF 18000-6c Remote Identification Rubber Tire Label
Brand: Quanzhou Hecere Electronic Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2027241505

Fujian, ChinaQuanzhou Hecere Electronic Co., Ltd.

US$1.20

100-999 Pieces

US$1.08

1,000-4,999 Pieces

US$0.92

5,000-9,999 Pieces

US$0.80

10,000+ Pieces

Sample price:US$1.00/piece.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Certification

CCC, RoHS, ISO, CE, FCC

Shape

Rectangle

Model NO.

RFID TAG

Chip Type

Read/Write

Power Supply Mode

Passive

Usage

Livestock, Electronic Products, Luggage, Jewelry, Book, Garment, Shoe, Bag

Material

Rubber

Transport Package

120PCS/Bag

Specification

95x35x3mm

Trademark

HECERE

Origin

China

HS Code

8523521000

Production Capacity

80000000/Month

Key features

Wide Read Range: Read range from 1cm to 200cm depending on application and installation.

High Rewrite Cycles: Supports 100,000 rewrite times with 10 years data storage capacity.

Multi-Protocol Support: Compatible with ISO/IEC 18000-6c and EPC Class1 Gen2 standards.

Strong Anti-Jamming: Designed with strong anti-jamming capabilities for complex environments.

Versatile Application: Suitable for vehicles, logistics, access control, schools, and sports.

Multiple Chip Options: Supports Alien H3 and optional Impinj Monza 4E chips.

Comprehensive Certifications: Certified by CCC, RoHS, ISO, CE, and FCC standards.

Company profile

Years of Export ExperienceR&D CapabilitiesProduct CertificationDigital Management Enterprise

Quanzhou Hecere Electronic Co., Ltd.

Fujian, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/FactoryExport Year: 2020-11-28Average Response Time: ≤8.85h

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryQuanzhou Hecere Electronic Co., Ltd. is identified as a China-based limited company offering RFID Tags. The records describe both trading-company and manufacturer/factory classifications, with five employees and no affiliated company. It has 11 years of export experience and self-operated import/export rights. The supplier supports minor and flexible customization but reports no new products in the past year, no ODM service, and no available SDK. Quality and after-sales systems appear weak: finished products are checked by packing staff, with no written complaint-handling or corrective-action procedures and no stated quality assurance. No financial figures or sufficient financial assessment evidence are provided. The supplier has no overseas showroom, agents, branches, or offline trade-show participation. A TUV Rheinland audit record is present for the RFID Tag product, but the meaning of the recorded evaluation result is not specified.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier has no written procedures or records for handling customer complaints or for corrective and preventive actions related to service capability. It also has no overseas showroom, agents, branches, or stated overseas service countries, indicating explicit weaknesses in documented after-sales support and international service coverage.

R&D capabilityThe supplier's business scope includes research and development of electronic, communication, and automatic-control technologies, but the records state that no new products were introduced in the past year, no ODM service is offered, and no SDK is available. This provides explicit evidence of limited recent product innovation and development support.

Production capacityThe supplier is classified as a manufacturer/factory in one record and offers RFID Tags, but finished products are checked by packing staff and no quality-assurance system is reported. The company has five employees and zero cooperative suppliers listed, so production scale and robustness are not demonstrated; the stated quality-control evidence indicates a deficiency.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly offers minor customization and flexible customization design services. However, the records do not describe the scope, technical limits, or delivery process for these services; the available evidence supports customization capability at a limited or flexible level.