Factory Stock Solid Color Import Ramie Linen Fabric

Name: Factory Stock Solid Color Import Ramie Linen Fabric
Brand: Haining Xinyi Import&Export Co., Ltd.
SKU: 793983602

Zhejiang, ChinaHaining Xinyi Import&Export Co., Ltd.

US$1.00

1,000 Meters

Sample price:US$1.00/square meter.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Technics

Woven

Width

55/56''

Model NO.

xy099

Weight

200-340GSM

Style

Plain

Fiber Types

Textured Yarn

Application

Home Textile, Curtain, Sofa

Function

Tear-Resistant, Waterproof, Flame Retardant, Black-out

Knitting Technics

Weft

Physical Feature

Medium Strength

Fiber Cross Section

Hollow Filament

Size

55-56''

Name 1

Linen Fabric

Name 2

Sofa Fabric

Name 3

Polyester Fabric

Name 4

Woven Fabric

Name 5

Chair Fabric

Name 6

Jacquard Fabric

Name 7

Upholstery Fabric

Transport Package

Poly Bag

Specification

50-60M/roll

Trademark

Origin

Haining Jiaxing Zhejiang China

HS Code

5407520092

Production Capacity

300000 Meters Per Month

Company profile

Years of Export ExperienceFast DeliveryCustomization from SamplesQA/QC Inspectors

Haining Xinyi Import&Export Co., Ltd.

Zhejiang, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Samples CertifiedExport Year: 12 Years CertifiedNearest Port: Shanghai Port; Ningbo PortAverage Response Time: ≤4.23h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryHaining Xinyi Import&Export Co., Ltd. is a China-based trading company established in 2010 with 11 employees. It reports strong export orientation, with exports representing 90% of total sales, and accepts multiple trade and payment terms. However, the available evidence indicates limited service infrastructure: no in-stock capacity, overseas warehouses, overseas showrooms, or overseas service locations. Service procedures exist in some areas but lack records, while complaint handling has no written procedures or records. R&D and innovation evidence is weak, with no available SDK, no new products in the past year, no ODM service, and no stated internationally recognized design or national science and technology awards. Quality controls include random finished-product inspection by packing staff and two QA/QC inspectors, but raw-material traceability is absent. Financial records are only identified by year, without sufficient detail to assess credibility.

Supplier typeThe supplier is explicitly identified as a trading company, legally organized as a limited company in China. Its stated business profile includes export trade, service, R&D, quality control, and sustainability information, but the entity type indicates that it is not presented as a manufacturer.

After-Sales capabilityService procedures exist for supplier service assessment and corrective/preventive actions, but no records are available; complaint handling has neither written procedures nor records. The supplier also reports no in-stock service capacity, overseas warehouses, overseas showrooms, or overseas service locations, although it has one-month stated lead times and access to Shanghai and Ningbo ports.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports no available SDK, no new products during the past year, no ODM service, no OEM service for popular brands, and zero internationally recognized design awards and national science and technology progress awards. These explicit indicators show limited documented R&D and innovation capability.

Production capacityThe supplier is a trading company and reports no in-stock service capacity; the status of outsourced manufacturing procedures and contracts is unknown. Quality-related evidence shows random finished-product inspection, inspection by packing staff, two QA/QC inspectors, and no raw-material traceability, so production capability is not demonstrated and quality-control limitations are explicit.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly offers customization from samples, demonstrating a stated sample-based customization capability. However, it does not provide ODM services, so the evidence supports limited customization rather than broader product-development capability.