for Bedding Bag Chenille Jacquard Sofa Fabric Price Per Meter

Name: for Bedding Bag Chenille Jacquard Sofa Fabric Price Per Meter
Brand: Haining Xinyi Import&Export Co., Ltd.
SKU: 786965005

Zhejiang, ChinaHaining Xinyi Import&Export Co., Ltd.

US$1.00

1,000 Meters

Product profile

Customization

Available

Applicable Season

Autumn, Springtime, Summertime, Wintertime

Bedding Type

Pillowtail

Model NO.

TL-0011

Drying Method

Direct Sunlight

Production Technology

Plain Bedding

Shell Fabric

Terylene

Washing Method

Hand Wash

Size

57''

Technics

Woven

Width

57/58''

Weight

200-340GSM

Style

Yarn Dyed

Fiber Types

Short Fiber

Application

Sofa, Home Textile, Bag, Bedding, Garment

Function

Anti-Static, Shrink-Resistant

Knitting Technics

Warp

Physical Feature

Medium Strength

Fiber Cross Section

Hollow Filament

Transport Package

Poly Bag

Specification

40-50M/roll

Trademark

Origin

Haining Jiaxing Zhejiang China

HS Code

5407520092

Production Capacity

200000 Meters Per Month

Company profile

Years of Export ExperienceFast DeliveryCustomization from SamplesQA/QC Inspectors

Haining Xinyi Import&Export Co., Ltd.

Zhejiang, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Samples CertifiedExport Year: 12 Years CertifiedNearest Port: Shanghai Port; Ningbo PortAverage Response Time: ≤4.89h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryHaining Xinyi Import&Export Co., Ltd. is a China-based trading company established in 2010 with 11 employees. It reports strong export orientation, with exports representing 90% of total sales, and accepts multiple trade and payment terms. However, the available evidence indicates limited service infrastructure: no in-stock capacity, overseas warehouses, overseas showrooms, or overseas service locations. Service procedures exist in some areas but lack records, while complaint handling has no written procedures or records. R&D and innovation evidence is weak, with no available SDK, no new products in the past year, no ODM service, and no stated internationally recognized design or national science and technology awards. Quality controls include random finished-product inspection by packing staff and two QA/QC inspectors, but raw-material traceability is absent. Financial records are only identified by year, without sufficient detail to assess credibility.

Supplier typeThe supplier is explicitly identified as a trading company, legally organized as a limited company in China. Its stated business profile includes export trade, service, R&D, quality control, and sustainability information, but the entity type indicates that it is not presented as a manufacturer.

After-Sales capabilityService procedures exist for supplier service assessment and corrective/preventive actions, but no records are available; complaint handling has neither written procedures nor records. The supplier also reports no in-stock service capacity, overseas warehouses, overseas showrooms, or overseas service locations, although it has one-month stated lead times and access to Shanghai and Ningbo ports.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports no available SDK, no new products during the past year, no ODM service, no OEM service for popular brands, and zero internationally recognized design awards and national science and technology progress awards. These explicit indicators show limited documented R&D and innovation capability.

Production capacityThe supplier is a trading company and reports no in-stock service capacity; the status of outsourced manufacturing procedures and contracts is unknown. Quality-related evidence shows random finished-product inspection, inspection by packing staff, two QA/QC inspectors, and no raw-material traceability, so production capability is not demonstrated and quality-control limitations are explicit.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly offers customization from samples, demonstrating a stated sample-based customization capability. However, it does not provide ODM services, so the evidence supports limited customization rather than broader product-development capability.