Reliable Sany Sy60 Crawler Excavator for Construction Needs

Name: Reliable Sany Sy60 Crawler Excavator for Construction Needs
Brand: Shanghai Huaiyun Machenical Equipment Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2294809605

Shanghai, ChinaShanghai Huaiyun Machenical Equipment Co., Ltd.

US$7,000.00

1-2 sets

US$6,000.00

3+ sets

Product profile

Customization

Available

After-sales Service

1year

Warranty

1year

Model NO.

Sany 60c

Type

Crawler Excavator

Usage

GM Excavator

Bucket

Backhoe

Transmission

Mechanical Transmission

Drive Type

Internal Combustion Drive

Bucket Capacity

0.1~0.5m³

Size

Small-Scale

Certification

Condition

Used

Machine Weight

6000kg

Hydraulic Cylinder

Brand Original

Engine Brand

Cummins

Unique Selling

High Digging Power Point

Engine Brana

Cummins

Moving Type

Crawler Excavator

Power(W)

36kw

Hydraulic Valve

Brand Original

Machinery Test

Report Provided

Hydraulic Pump

Brand Original

Transport Package

Specification

Trademark

Sany

Origin

China

HS Code

8429521200

Production Capacity

3000

Company profile

High Repeat Buyers ChoiceIn-stock CapacityFast DeliveryOverseas Services

Shanghai Huaiyun Machenical Equipment Co., Ltd.

Shanghai, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service Available CertifiedCustomization Options: Flexible customization CertifiedExport Year: 2 years CertifiedNearest Port: shanghai portAverage Response Time: ≤1.27h

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is identified as a trading company engaged in mechanical equipment sales and related technical services, with product coverage including excavators, loaders, bulldozers, backhoes, motor graders, spare parts, buckets, quick hitches, hammers, and rubber tracks. It reports CE certification and overseas service offerings covering installation, training, repair, maintenance, and debugging, with stated lead times within 15 working days in both peak and off-peak periods. However, its R&D capability indicates no available SDK, and its reported financial, revenue, cash-flow, asset, and profitability figures are all zero. Service-management controls are mixed: corrective and preventive action procedures are documented, but service assessment lacks written procedures or records and complaint handling lacks written records. No Fortune 500 cooperation or supplier management-system certification is reported.

Supplier typeThe supplier is explicitly classified as a trading company, with a stated business scope covering mechanical equipment sales, metal products, electronic components, metal materials, equipment leasing, and technical services. Its commercial engagement is also described as manufacturing and processing machinery, indicating machinery-sector trading and related service activity rather than a clearly documented manufacturing identity.

CertificationsCE certification is reported for the products, supporting compliance with the stated product standard. However, supplier management-system certification is listed as NIL, so the evidence supports product certification but not broader management-system certification.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier reports overseas installation, training, repair, maintenance, and debugging services, with lead times within 15 working days during both peak and off-peak periods. Nevertheless, service-capability assessment has no written procedures or records, and complaint handling has a procedure but no written records; therefore, operational service offerings are evident, while documentation and control effectiveness are incomplete.

Financial creditReported operating revenue, operating costs, gross profit, operating profit, cash received, cash inflows, cash outflows, total assets, and current-ratio figures are all zero across the stated periods. These figures indicate a significant financial-information concern, although the slices do not explain whether the values reflect actual performance or incomplete reporting.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports no available SDK and only one year of total R&D-engineer experience. The evidence does not demonstrate developed software integration capability or substantial R&D resources.