What is the minimum qualified ratio of spherical granules?

The qualified ratio of spherical granules is a minimum of 98.0%.

How is the silica gel packed and loaded?

The product is packed and loaded according to standard shipping requirements for chemical raw materials.

Silica Gel; Silicon Dioxide; Desiccant

Name: Silica Gel; Silicon Dioxide; Desiccant
Brand: Hainan Huarong Chemical Co., Ltd.
SKU: 784195505

Hainan, ChinaHainan Huarong Chemical Co., Ltd.

US$1.00

1 Ton

Product profile

Customization

Available

CAS No.

112926-00-8

Formula

Sio2

Model NO.

112926-00-8

EINECS

601-214-2

Certification

CE, RoHS

Purity

96min

Type

Calcium Chloride

Grade Standard

Food Grade

Molecular Weight

60.0800018310547

Melting Point

1610°c

Boiling Point

2230℃

Odor

Sour

Transport Package

25kg/Bag

Specification

96%min

Trademark

Origin

China

HS Code

2811220000

Production Capacity

5000mt/Month

Key features

Multi-Color Options: Available in blue, white, orange, and cat litter silica gel variants.

High Adsorption Capacity: Adsorption capacity reaches 38.35% at 90% RH for effective moisture control.

Versatile Applications: Used as desiccant, deodorant, and air purifier for food, medicine, and shipping.

Strict Quality Standards: 98% minimum qualified spherical granule ratio with 97.5% size qualification.

Certified Safety: Meets CE and RoHS certifications with Food Grade purity of 96% minimum.

High Bulk Density: Bulk density of 752-767 g/L ensures efficient packing and storage.

Company profile

Hainan Huarong Chemical Co., Ltd.

Hainan, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading CompanyExport Year: 2005-04-25Average Response Time: ≤8.72h

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is a small Haikou-based trading company with eight employees and no stated affiliation with a larger group. It has operated export business since 2005 and reports that exports account for 90% of total sales. Service-related procedures exist for corrective and preventive actions, complaint handling, supplier assessment, and quotation/payment terms, but several procedures have no supporting records. The supplier has quality assurance in its quality-control processes, but no certification information is provided. It offers ODM services but reported no new products in the past year, no SDK, and no OEM service for popular brands. Manufacturing scale and staffing appear limited, with two production lines, fewer than five quality-control staff, and no in-stock or overseas warehouse capability. Evidence is insufficient to verify financial strength or customer cases.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier has procedures for corrective and preventive actions and customer complaints, but no written records were available. It accepts multiple quotation and payment terms and reports a one-month average lead time in both peak and off-season; however, it has no overseas showroom, agents or branches, trade-show participation, overseas service countries, in-stock capability, or overseas warehouse.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports no new products during the past year, no available SDK, and fewer than five years of total R&D-engineer experience, although it does offer ODM services. The explicit absence of recent product development and SDK support indicates limited demonstrated innovation capability.

Production capacityThe supplier operates two production lines and has fewer than five quality-control staff, while reporting no in-stock service capacity. The status of manufacturing-capacity reconciliation, outsourcing procedures, and valid contracts is unknown, so operational production capacity is only partially evidenced and appears limited.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly provides ODM services, which supports an ability to offer original-design manufacturing customization. However, it reports no OEM service for popular brands and no SDK, so the evidence supports ODM customization but not broader branded or software-enabled customization.