Where is the company located?

The company is located in Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.

What are the main applications of PPDI?

It is used for medical tubing, enzyme immobilization, and polyurea resist film deposition.

Factory Direct Sale of Polyether Polyol and Isocyanate Phenylene Diisocyanate CAS 104-49-4

Name: Factory Direct Sale of Polyether Polyol and Isocyanate Phenylene Diisocyanate CAS 104-49-4
Brand: Ningbo Jinao Enprotech Co., Limited
SKU: 2114381042

Zhejiang, ChinaNingbo Jinao Enprotech Co., Limited

US$2.40-3.00

1,000 kg

Sample price:US$100.00/kg.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

CAS No.

104-49-4

Formula

C8h4n2o2

Model NO.

CAS 104-49-4

EINECS

203-207-6

Color

Brown

Product Name

Phenylene Diisocyanate Ppdi P-Phenylene Diisocyana

Transport

25 Kg Paper Bag or as The Request of Customer.

Brand Name

Jinao

Grade

Industrial Grade

Storage

Cool Dry Place

Transport Package

200kg

Specification

99%

Trademark

DOBO

Origin

China

Production Capacity

100000 Ton/Tons Per Month

Key features

Industrial Grade Quality: High purity PPDI suitable for medical tubing and industrial applications.

Flexible Packaging Options: Available in 25 Kg paper bags or customized packaging per customer request.

Fast Lead Time: Peak and off-peak season delivery within 15 workdays.

Multiple Payment Methods: Supports LC, T/T, PayPal, Western Union, and Money Gram.

Global Shipping Terms: Flexible Incoterms including FOB, CFR, CIF, and DDP.

Versatile Applications: Used as cross-linking reagent and in polyurea resist film deposition.

Trusted Manufacturer: Established exporter since 2020 with presence in Ningbo, China.

Company profile

Importers and ExportersHigh Repeat Buyers ChoiceFast DeliveryQA/QC Inspectors

Ningbo Jinao Enprotech Co., Limited

Zhejiang, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading CompanyExport Year: 2020-07-08Nearest Port: NINGBO, Tianjin, ShanghaiAverage Response Time: ≤1.63hTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, PayPal, etc.International Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, CFR, CIF, DDP

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is identified as a trading company operating mainly in the domestic market, with offerings related to chemical, plastic, leather, textile, and recycled-resource products. It reports a one-month lead time in both peak and off-peak seasons and lists multiple payment and quotation terms. However, the supplier reports no inventory, overseas warehouse, overseas showroom, overseas agents or branches, and no overseas service countries. No supplier-management-system certifications are listed. Quality assurance and raw-material traceability are explicitly absent, while corrective-action and complaint-handling procedures exist without written records. R&D, ODM, OEM for popular brands, and SDK capabilities are not available, and no new products were developed in the past year. Production information is provided for polyether polyol, but the supplier’s trading-company status and limited supporting operational evidence prevent a strong conclusion about manufacturing depth. No customer cases are provided.

Supplier typeThe supplier is explicitly classified as a trading company. Its stated business scope covers chemical products, plastic products, leather products, textiles and related materials, and recycled-resource research, indicating a broad commercial product scope rather than a clearly documented manufacturing specialization.

CertificationsNo supplier-management-system certifications are listed, and the quality-control information explicitly states that quality assurance is absent. These records provide explicit evidence of a certification and quality-system deficiency.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports no new products in the past year, no ODM service, no SDK availability, and only one year of total R&D-engineer experience. These explicit statements show limited documented innovation capability.

Customization capabilityThe supplier describes products and broad business activities but explicitly reports no ODM service and no OEM service for popular brands. This indicates a stated lack of documented brand-oriented customization capability.