High-Quality Polyether Polyol PPG 3000MW for Industrial Use

Name: High-Quality Polyether Polyol PPG 3000MW for Industrial Use
Brand: Ningbo Jinao Enprotech Co., Limited
SKU: 2128549442

Zhejiang, ChinaNingbo Jinao Enprotech Co., Limited

US$1.50

1,000-4,999 kg

US$1.40

5,000-9,999 kg

US$1.30

10,000+ kg

Sample price:US$100.00/kg.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

CAS No.

9082-00-2

Formula

C8h18o5

Model NO.

CAS 9082-00-2

EINECS

618-355-0

Molecular Principal Chain

Naphthenic Polymer

Color

Light Yellow

Product Name

Polyether Polyol/Polymeric Polyol Pop

Usage

Syntheses Material Intermediates

Type

Polyurethane Raw Material

Applications

for Polyurethane Foam Soft Furniure

Quality

Top Grade

Transport Package

Net Weight 200kg Iron Drum

Specification

99%

Trademark

Jinao

Origin

China

Production Capacity

100000 Ton/Tons Per Month

Key features

High-Quality PPG 3000MW: Polyether polyol with 3000 molecular weight for industrial polyurethane applications.

Versatile Applications: Used for polyurethane foam, soft furniture, sleeping mattresses, and auto seats.

Excellent Stability: Features high activity, good stability, and high chain segment strength.

Wide Solubility: Soluble in aromatic hydrocarbons, halogenated hydrocarbons, alcohols, and ketones.

Fast Delivery: Average lead time within 15 workdays for both peak and off seasons.

Flexible Payment: Supports LC, T/T, PayPal, Western Union, and Money Gram payment terms.

Global Export: Exports to North America, Africa, Eastern Europe, Asia, and the Middle East.

Certified Quality: CAS No. 9082-00-2, EINECS 618-355-0, Top Grade quality standard.

Company profile

Importers and ExportersHigh Repeat Buyers ChoiceFast DeliveryQA/QC Inspectors

Ningbo Jinao Enprotech Co., Limited

Zhejiang, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading CompanyExport Year: 2020-07-08Nearest Port: NINGBO, Tianjin, ShanghaiAverage Response Time: ≤2.14hTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, PayPal, etc.International Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, CFR, CIF, DDP

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is identified as a trading company operating mainly in the domestic market, with offerings related to chemical, plastic, leather, textile, and recycled-resource products. It reports a one-month lead time in both peak and off-peak seasons and lists multiple payment and quotation terms. However, the supplier reports no inventory, overseas warehouse, overseas showroom, overseas agents or branches, and no overseas service countries. No supplier-management-system certifications are listed. Quality assurance and raw-material traceability are explicitly absent, while corrective-action and complaint-handling procedures exist without written records. R&D, ODM, OEM for popular brands, and SDK capabilities are not available, and no new products were developed in the past year. Production information is provided for polyether polyol, but the supplier’s trading-company status and limited supporting operational evidence prevent a strong conclusion about manufacturing depth. No customer cases are provided.

Supplier typeThe supplier is explicitly classified as a trading company. Its stated business scope covers chemical products, plastic products, leather products, textiles and related materials, and recycled-resource research, indicating a broad commercial product scope rather than a clearly documented manufacturing specialization.

CertificationsNo supplier-management-system certifications are listed, and the quality-control information explicitly states that quality assurance is absent. These records provide explicit evidence of a certification and quality-system deficiency.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports no new products in the past year, no ODM service, no SDK availability, and only one year of total R&D-engineer experience. These explicit statements show limited documented innovation capability.

Customization capabilityThe supplier describes products and broad business activities but explicitly reports no ODM service and no OEM service for popular brands. This indicates a stated lack of documented brand-oriented customization capability.