Where is the company located?

The company is located in Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.

Polybutylene Terephthalate PBT GF25 Particles for Wiper Injection Molding

Name: Polybutylene Terephthalate PBT GF25 Particles for Wiper Injection Molding
Brand: Ningbo Jinao Enprotech Co., Limited
SKU: 2124497192

Zhejiang, ChinaNingbo Jinao Enprotech Co., Limited

US$1.98-2.50

1,000 kg

Sample price:US$100.00/kg.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

CAS No.

24968-12-5

Formula

(C12h12o4)N

Model NO.

PBT

EINECS

Polybutylene Terephthalate

Color

White

Product Name

PBT Polyethylene Terephthalate

Features

High Temperature Resistance

Form

Granule

Application

General Plastics, Engineering Plastics

Transport Package

Flexi Tank, 200L Drums, 1000kgs

Specification

IBC1000kg /200kg/Flexi Tank

Trademark

JINAO

Origin

China

Production Capacity

50000ton/Month

Key features

High Temperature Resistance: Withstands long-term heat exposure with high HDT and temperature index.

Outstanding Chemical Resistance: Resistant to acids, alcohols, hydrocarbons, solvents, oils, and greases.

Excellent Electrical Insulation: High electrical resistance and dielectric strength for electronic components.

Dimensional Stability: Low water absorption and excellent creep resistance ensure stability.

Fast Crystallization: Low molding temperatures allow rapid crystallization compared to other plastics.

Flame Retardant: Meets UL94 V-0 and 5VA flammability classes for safety.

High Mechanical Strength: Superior tensile, flexural, and impact strength properties.

Versatile Application: Suitable for general and engineering plastics, including wiper injection molding.

Company profile

Importers and ExportersHigh Repeat Buyers ChoiceFast DeliveryQA/QC Inspectors

Ningbo Jinao Enprotech Co., Limited

Zhejiang, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading CompanyExport Year: 2020-07-08Nearest Port: NINGBO, Tianjin, ShanghaiAverage Response Time: ≤1.62hTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, PayPal, etc.International Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, CFR, CIF, DDP

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is identified as a trading company operating mainly in the domestic market, with offerings related to chemical, plastic, leather, textile, and recycled-resource products. It reports a one-month lead time in both peak and off-peak seasons and lists multiple payment and quotation terms. However, the supplier reports no inventory, overseas warehouse, overseas showroom, overseas agents or branches, and no overseas service countries. No supplier-management-system certifications are listed. Quality assurance and raw-material traceability are explicitly absent, while corrective-action and complaint-handling procedures exist without written records. R&D, ODM, OEM for popular brands, and SDK capabilities are not available, and no new products were developed in the past year. Production information is provided for polyether polyol, but the supplier’s trading-company status and limited supporting operational evidence prevent a strong conclusion about manufacturing depth. No customer cases are provided.

Supplier typeThe supplier is explicitly classified as a trading company. Its stated business scope covers chemical products, plastic products, leather products, textiles and related materials, and recycled-resource research, indicating a broad commercial product scope rather than a clearly documented manufacturing specialization.

CertificationsNo supplier-management-system certifications are listed, and the quality-control information explicitly states that quality assurance is absent. These records provide explicit evidence of a certification and quality-system deficiency.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports no new products in the past year, no ODM service, no SDK availability, and only one year of total R&D-engineer experience. These explicit statements show limited documented innovation capability.

Customization capabilityThe supplier describes products and broad business activities but explicitly reports no ODM service and no OEM service for popular brands. This indicates a stated lack of documented brand-oriented customization capability.