What are the main ports of export?

The nearest ports are Ningbo, Tianjin, and Shanghai.

PVC Plasticizer CAS 28553-12-0 PVC Plasticizer Diisodecyl Phthalate Didp

Name: PVC Plasticizer CAS 28553-12-0 PVC Plasticizer Diisodecyl Phthalate Didp
Brand: Ningbo Jinao Enprotech Co., Limited
SKU: 2110095212

Zhejiang, ChinaNingbo Jinao Enprotech Co., Limited

US$1.30-1.50

1,000 kg

Sample price:US$100.00/kg.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

CAS No.

28553-12-0

Formula

247-977-1

Model NO.

CAS 28553-12-0

EINECS

257-843-4

Appearance

Liquid

Usage

Oil Drilling Auxiliary Agent, Coating Auxiliary Agents, Textile, Construction, Aviation, Shipbuilding

Color

Transparent

Type

Catalysts

Uage

Plastic Auxiliary Agents

Classification

Chemical Auxiliary Agent

Characteristic

Eco-Frindly

Transport Package

Net Weight 200kg Iron Drum

Specification

99%

Trademark

DOBO

Origin

China

Production Capacity

100000 Ton/Tons Per Month

Key features

High Heat Resistance: Ideal for products requiring high heat resistance and insulation.

Wide Industry Application: Used in automotive, cable materials, oil drilling, and tanning fields.

Eco-Friendly Characteristic: Classified as an eco-friendly chemical auxiliary agent.

Transparent Appearance: Delivered as a transparent liquid for versatile usage.

Fast Lead Time: Peak and off-peak season lead time within 15 workdays.

Multiple Payment Options: Supports LC, T/T, PayPal, Western Union, and Money Gram.

Flexible Shipping Terms: Available via FOB, CFR, CIF, and DDP from Ningbo, Tianjin, or Shanghai.

Global Market Reach: Exports to North America, Africa, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East.

Company profile

Importers and ExportersHigh Repeat Buyers ChoiceFast DeliveryQA/QC Inspectors

Ningbo Jinao Enprotech Co., Limited

Zhejiang, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading CompanyExport Year: 2020-07-08Nearest Port: NINGBO, Tianjin, ShanghaiAverage Response Time: ≤1.64hTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, PayPal, etc.International Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, CFR, CIF, DDP

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is identified as a trading company operating mainly in the domestic market, with offerings related to chemical, plastic, leather, textile, and recycled-resource products. It reports a one-month lead time in both peak and off-peak seasons and lists multiple payment and quotation terms. However, the supplier reports no inventory, overseas warehouse, overseas showroom, overseas agents or branches, and no overseas service countries. No supplier-management-system certifications are listed. Quality assurance and raw-material traceability are explicitly absent, while corrective-action and complaint-handling procedures exist without written records. R&D, ODM, OEM for popular brands, and SDK capabilities are not available, and no new products were developed in the past year. Production information is provided for polyether polyol, but the supplier’s trading-company status and limited supporting operational evidence prevent a strong conclusion about manufacturing depth. No customer cases are provided.

Supplier typeThe supplier is explicitly classified as a trading company. Its stated business scope covers chemical products, plastic products, leather products, textiles and related materials, and recycled-resource research, indicating a broad commercial product scope rather than a clearly documented manufacturing specialization.

CertificationsNo supplier-management-system certifications are listed, and the quality-control information explicitly states that quality assurance is absent. These records provide explicit evidence of a certification and quality-system deficiency.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports no new products in the past year, no ODM service, no SDK availability, and only one year of total R&D-engineer experience. These explicit statements show limited documented innovation capability.

Customization capabilityThe supplier describes products and broad business activities but explicitly reports no ODM service and no OEM service for popular brands. This indicates a stated lack of documented brand-oriented customization capability.