What is the physical appearance of the product?

It appears as a brown liquid at room temperature.

Soft Polyurethane Foam Adhesive Organic Intermediate Mdi (CAS 9016-87-9) Pm200 Catalyst Polyol and Isocyanate

Name: Soft Polyurethane Foam Adhesive Organic Intermediate Mdi (CAS 9016-87-9) Pm200 Catalyst Polyol and Isocyanate
Brand: Ningbo Jinao Enprotech Co., Limited
SKU: 2113262982

Zhejiang, ChinaNingbo Jinao Enprotech Co., Limited

US$3.00

1,000-4,999 kg

US$2.50

5,000-9,999 kg

US$2.00

10,000+ kg

Sample price:US$100.00/kg.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

CAS No.

9016-87-9

Formula

CH2-Chcl-]N

Model NO.

CAS 9016-87-9

EINECS

208-750-2

Molecular Principal Chain

Naphthenic Polymer

Color

Brown Liquid

Product Name

Polyol and Isocyanate Pmdi

OEM/ODM

Available

Validity Period

2 Years

Freature

Chemical Resistance

Place of Origin

Zhejiang, China

Transport Package

Net Weight 200kg Iron Drum

Specification

99%

Trademark

Jinao

Origin

China

Production Capacity

100000 Ton/Tons Per Month

Key features

Versatile Application: Used in rigid foam, coatings, adhesives, anti-seepage, and automotive parts.

High Foam Fluidity: Unique composition ensures excellent fluidity for strict foaming stock requirements.

Chemical Resistance: Features strong chemical resistance suitable for industrial insulation and structural foams.

OEM/ODM Available: Customization options available for product name and specific requirements.

Stable Specifications: NCO content 30.5-32.0%, density 1.220-1.250 g/cm3, viscosity 150-250 mPa.S.

Fast Lead Time: Average lead time within 15 workdays for both peak and off-season periods.

Company profile

Importers and ExportersHigh Repeat Buyers ChoiceFast DeliveryQA/QC Inspectors

Ningbo Jinao Enprotech Co., Limited

Zhejiang, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading CompanyExport Year: 2020-07-08Nearest Port: NINGBO, Tianjin, ShanghaiAverage Response Time: ≤1.39hTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, PayPal, etc.International Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, CFR, CIF, DDP

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is identified as a trading company operating mainly in the domestic market, with offerings related to chemical, plastic, leather, textile, and recycled-resource products. It reports a one-month lead time in both peak and off-peak seasons and lists multiple payment and quotation terms. However, the supplier reports no inventory, overseas warehouse, overseas showroom, overseas agents or branches, and no overseas service countries. No supplier-management-system certifications are listed. Quality assurance and raw-material traceability are explicitly absent, while corrective-action and complaint-handling procedures exist without written records. R&D, ODM, OEM for popular brands, and SDK capabilities are not available, and no new products were developed in the past year. Production information is provided for polyether polyol, but the supplier’s trading-company status and limited supporting operational evidence prevent a strong conclusion about manufacturing depth. No customer cases are provided.

Supplier typeThe supplier is explicitly classified as a trading company. Its stated business scope covers chemical products, plastic products, leather products, textiles and related materials, and recycled-resource research, indicating a broad commercial product scope rather than a clearly documented manufacturing specialization.

CertificationsNo supplier-management-system certifications are listed, and the quality-control information explicitly states that quality assurance is absent. These records provide explicit evidence of a certification and quality-system deficiency.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports no new products in the past year, no ODM service, no SDK availability, and only one year of total R&D-engineer experience. These explicit statements show limited documented innovation capability.

Customization capabilityThe supplier describes products and broad business activities but explicitly reports no ODM service and no OEM service for popular brands. This indicates a stated lack of documented brand-oriented customization capability.