Which ports can be used for shipping?

The nearest ports are Ningbo, Tianjin, and Shanghai.

What is the physical appearance of the product?

It is a colorless to light yellow viscous liquid.

Trimethylolpropane Monoallyl Ether, Tmpme CAS No 682-09-7

Name: Trimethylolpropane Monoallyl Ether, Tmpme CAS No 682-09-7
Brand: Ningbo Jinao Enprotech Co., Limited
SKU: 2116173212

Zhejiang, ChinaNingbo Jinao Enprotech Co., Limited

US$2.50

1,000-4,999 kg

US$2.40

5,000-9,999 kg

US$2.00

10,000+ kg

Sample price:US$100.00/kg.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

CAS No.

682-09-7

Formula

C12h22o3

Model NO.

CAS 682-09-7

EINECS

211-661-1

Molecular Principal Chain

Element Organic Polymer

Color

Colourless Transparent Liquid

Product Name

Trimethylolpropane Diallyl Ether (Tmpde) CAS 682-0

Use 1

Unsaturated Polyester Resins

Use 2

Drying Agent

Use 3

Reactivity in Esterification

Transport Package

Net Weight 200kg Iron Drum

Specification

99%

Trademark

Jinao

Origin

China

Production Capacity

100000 Ton/Tons Per Month

Key features

Solubility Profile: Soluble in organic solvents but practically insoluble in water.

Key Applications: Ideal for Unsaturated Polyester Resins, Drying Agents, and Esterification.

Standard Packaging: Available in 200kg drums for safe transport and storage.

Fast Lead Time: Peak and off-peak season delivery within 15 workdays.

Flexible Payment Terms: Accepts LC, T/T, PayPal, Western Union, and Money Gram.

Multiple Shipping Options: Offers FOB, CFR, CIF, and DDP terms from Ningbo, Tianjin, or Shanghai.

High Purity Specifications: CAS 682-09-7 with precise density and refractive index values.

Company profile

Importers and ExportersHigh Repeat Buyers ChoiceFast DeliveryQA/QC Inspectors

Ningbo Jinao Enprotech Co., Limited

Zhejiang, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading CompanyExport Year: 2020-07-08Nearest Port: NINGBO, Tianjin, ShanghaiAverage Response Time: ≤1.62hTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, PayPal, etc.International Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, CFR, CIF, DDP

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is identified as a trading company operating mainly in the domestic market, with offerings related to chemical, plastic, leather, textile, and recycled-resource products. It reports a one-month lead time in both peak and off-peak seasons and lists multiple payment and quotation terms. However, the supplier reports no inventory, overseas warehouse, overseas showroom, overseas agents or branches, and no overseas service countries. No supplier-management-system certifications are listed. Quality assurance and raw-material traceability are explicitly absent, while corrective-action and complaint-handling procedures exist without written records. R&D, ODM, OEM for popular brands, and SDK capabilities are not available, and no new products were developed in the past year. Production information is provided for polyether polyol, but the supplier’s trading-company status and limited supporting operational evidence prevent a strong conclusion about manufacturing depth. No customer cases are provided.

Supplier typeThe supplier is explicitly classified as a trading company. Its stated business scope covers chemical products, plastic products, leather products, textiles and related materials, and recycled-resource research, indicating a broad commercial product scope rather than a clearly documented manufacturing specialization.

CertificationsNo supplier-management-system certifications are listed, and the quality-control information explicitly states that quality assurance is absent. These records provide explicit evidence of a certification and quality-system deficiency.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports no new products in the past year, no ODM service, no SDK availability, and only one year of total R&D-engineer experience. These explicit statements show limited documented innovation capability.

Customization capabilityThe supplier describes products and broad business activities but explicitly reports no ODM service and no OEM service for popular brands. This indicates a stated lack of documented brand-oriented customization capability.