Is this product suitable for industrial use?

Yes, it is classified as Industrial Grade and suitable for various industrial applications.

What is the storage requirement?

Store in a cool, dry place. It is incompatible with strong oxidizing agents and alcohols.

Wholesale Price Poliol Ep-3600 Ep-330n (G) Polyether Foam High-Resilient Polyether for Sportswear Elastic Components

Name: Wholesale Price Poliol Ep-3600 Ep-330n (G) Polyether Foam High-Resilient Polyether for Sportswear Elastic Components
Brand: Ningbo Jinao Enprotech Co., Limited
SKU: 2131148032

Zhejiang, ChinaNingbo Jinao Enprotech Co., Limited

US$2.40-3.00

1,000 kg

Sample price:US$100.00/kg.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

CAS No.

Formula

Model NO.

High-Resilient Polyether

EINECS

Color

Transparent

Product Name

High-Resilient Polyether Ep-3600 Ep-330n(G)

Transport

25 Kg Paper Bag or as The Request of Customer.

Brand Name

Jinao

Grade

Industrial Grade

Storage

Cool Dry Place

Application

PU Foam

Transport Package

200kg

Specification

99%

Trademark

DOBO

Origin

China

Production Capacity

100000 Ton/Tons Per Month

Key features

High-Resilient Polyether: Ideal for sportswear elastic components and polyurethane elastomers.

Versatile Applications: Used in coatings, adhesives, sealants, and as reaction intermediates.

Quality Improvement: Enhances product quality in various polyurethane fields.

Defoaming Agent: Functions effectively as a defoaming and antifoaming agent.

Flexible Packaging: Available in 25 Kg paper bags or customized per customer request.

Global Shipping: Export from Ningbo, Tianjin, or Shanghai to worldwide markets.

Company profile

Importers and ExportersHigh Repeat Buyers ChoiceFast DeliveryQA/QC Inspectors

Ningbo Jinao Enprotech Co., Limited

Zhejiang, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading CompanyExport Year: 2020-07-08Nearest Port: NINGBO, Tianjin, ShanghaiAverage Response Time: ≤1.33hTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, PayPal, etc.International Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, CFR, CIF, DDP

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is identified as a trading company operating mainly in the domestic market, with offerings related to chemical, plastic, leather, textile, and recycled-resource products. It reports a one-month lead time in both peak and off-peak seasons and lists multiple payment and quotation terms. However, the supplier reports no inventory, overseas warehouse, overseas showroom, overseas agents or branches, and no overseas service countries. No supplier-management-system certifications are listed. Quality assurance and raw-material traceability are explicitly absent, while corrective-action and complaint-handling procedures exist without written records. R&D, ODM, OEM for popular brands, and SDK capabilities are not available, and no new products were developed in the past year. Production information is provided for polyether polyol, but the supplier’s trading-company status and limited supporting operational evidence prevent a strong conclusion about manufacturing depth. No customer cases are provided.

Supplier typeThe supplier is explicitly classified as a trading company. Its stated business scope covers chemical products, plastic products, leather products, textiles and related materials, and recycled-resource research, indicating a broad commercial product scope rather than a clearly documented manufacturing specialization.

CertificationsNo supplier-management-system certifications are listed, and the quality-control information explicitly states that quality assurance is absent. These records provide explicit evidence of a certification and quality-system deficiency.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports no new products in the past year, no ODM service, no SDK availability, and only one year of total R&D-engineer experience. These explicit statements show limited documented innovation capability.

Customization capabilityThe supplier describes products and broad business activities but explicitly reports no ODM service and no OEM service for popular brands. This indicates a stated lack of documented brand-oriented customization capability.