What is the lead time for orders?

The average lead time is within 15 workdays for both peak and off-season.

What are the payment terms?

We accept LC (Letter of Credit) and T/T (Telegraphic Transfer) payments.

Bimetal Cable Connectors Lug Terminal Connector

Name: Bimetal Cable Connectors Lug Terminal Connector
Brand: Jiangsu Chuandu Electrical Technology Co., Ltd.
SKU: 899745125

Jiangsu, ChinaJiangsu Chuandu Electrical Technology Co., Ltd.

US$1.00-5.00

100 Pieces

Sample price:US$0.00/piece.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Technics

Forging

Standard

IEC 61284-1997

Model NO.

DTL

Usage

Substation Fittings, Line Fittings

Type

Distribution Fitting

ODM OEM

Samples

Free

Surface

Smooth

Warranty

12 Months

Transport Package

Wooden Case

Trademark

Da Sheng

Origin

Yangzhou City, China

HS Code

7616999000

Production Capacity

50000 Pieces/Month

Key features

IEC 61284-1997 Standard: Complies with IEC 61284-1997 standard for reliable performance.

Bimetal Conductivity: Red copper and yellow brass materials ensure excellent electrical conductivity.

Silver Plated Surface: National specification silver plated welding joints for safety and durability.

Forging Technics: High-quality forging process ensures strong and safe connections.

OEM/ODM Accepted: Customization services including OEM and ODM are available.

12 Months Warranty: Comprehensive 12-month warranty coverage for product quality assurance.

Free Samples: Free samples provided for quality verification before bulk orders.

Versatile Application: Suitable for substations, line fittings, and household electrical appliances.

Company profile

Jiangsu Chuandu Electrical Technology Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service AvailableExport Year: 2016-05-15 CertifiedNearest Port: Shanghai PortAverage Response Time: ≤15h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryJiangsu Chuandu Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based limited company in Jiangsu, established in 2012 according to the company profile, with another description stating operations were established in 1999. It supplies power-line and transmission-line hardware, reports eight production lines, 6–10 quality-control staff, and certifications including ISO9001:2015, ISO14001:2015, and ISO45001:2016. Reported production information includes 2,200,000 sets of power-line hardware and order fulfillment within 15 working days in both peak and off-peak seasons. The supplier has export capability and serves several international markets. Evidence of R&D resources exists, but customization capability, after-sales processes, and broader customer-case documentation are limited. Financial credibility cannot be assessed from the non-financial information provided.

Supplier typeThe supplier is identified as a trading company in one record and as a combined business entity and technology-based manufacturing enterprise in other records. Its product range, production lines, and stated manufacturing output support manufacturing involvement, although the conflicting classifications indicate that its exact business model should be verified.

CertificationsThe supplier reports ISO9001:2015, ISO14001:2015, and ISO45001:2016 certificates, covering quality, environmental, and occupational health and safety management systems. These stated certifications provide explicit evidence of formal management-system certification.

R&D capabilityThe company describes itself as technology-based, emphasizes innovation, and reports three R&D engineers. These facts indicate some innovation and development resources, but no patents, documented new products, or measurable R&D outcomes are provided.

Production capacityThe supplier reports 2,200,000 sets of power-line hardware output, eight production lines, 37 employees, 6–10 quality-control staff, and fulfillment within 15 working days in both peak and off-peak seasons. These explicit operational figures support a positive assessment of production capability, although the relationship between the stated annual output and the broader annual-output claim is not fully explained.