What is the surface finish and color?

The surface is Smooth, and the color is Silver.

What standards does this product comply with?

The product complies with IEC 61284-1997.

What is the main application of this link fitting?

It is used for overhead transmission lines, specifically at dead ends and corner structures.

Hot-DIP Galvanized Two Eye Extension Chain Ring Link

Name: Hot-DIP Galvanized Two Eye Extension Chain Ring Link
Brand: Jiangsu Chuandu Electrical Technology Co., Ltd.
SKU: 879559635

Jiangsu, ChinaJiangsu Chuandu Electrical Technology Co., Ltd.

US$1.00-5.00

100 Pieces

Sample price:US$0.00/piece.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Technics

Forging

Standard

IEC 61284-1997

Usage

Substation Fittings, Line Fittings

Type

Link Fittings

Colour

Silver

ODM OEM

Material

Steel

Samples

Free

Galvanization Type

Hot-DIP Galvanized

Galvanization Standard

ISO 1461-2009

Surface

Smooth

Warranty

12 Months

Application

Overhead Transmission Line

Model

Transport Package

Wooden Case

Specification

Trademark

Da Sheng

Origin

Yangzhou City, China

HS Code

8535900090

Production Capacity

50000 Pieces/Month

Key features

Hot-DIP Galvanized: Galvanization Type: Hot-DIP Galvanized, Standard: ISO 1461-2009

OEM/ODM Accepted: ODM OEM: Accept, Customization available

High Corrosion Resistance: Riveting after galvanizing assures zinc between steel pieces

Forging Technics: Technics: Forging, Material: Steel

12 Months Warranty: Warranty: 12 Months

Free Samples: Samples: Free

IEC Standard Compliance: Standard: IEC 61284-1997

Smooth Surface: Surface: Smooth, Colour: Silver

Company profile

Jiangsu Chuandu Electrical Technology Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service AvailableExport Year: 2016-05-15 CertifiedNearest Port: Shanghai PortAverage Response Time: ≤11.81h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryJiangsu Chuandu Electrical Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based limited company in Jiangsu, established in 2012 according to the company profile, with another description stating operations were established in 1999. It supplies power-line and transmission-line hardware, reports eight production lines, 6–10 quality-control staff, and certifications including ISO9001:2015, ISO14001:2015, and ISO45001:2016. Reported production information includes 2,200,000 sets of power-line hardware and order fulfillment within 15 working days in both peak and off-peak seasons. The supplier has export capability and serves several international markets. Evidence of R&D resources exists, but customization capability, after-sales processes, and broader customer-case documentation are limited. Financial credibility cannot be assessed from the non-financial information provided.

Supplier typeThe supplier is identified as a trading company in one record and as a combined business entity and technology-based manufacturing enterprise in other records. Its product range, production lines, and stated manufacturing output support manufacturing involvement, although the conflicting classifications indicate that its exact business model should be verified.

CertificationsThe supplier reports ISO9001:2015, ISO14001:2015, and ISO45001:2016 certificates, covering quality, environmental, and occupational health and safety management systems. These stated certifications provide explicit evidence of formal management-system certification.

R&D capabilityThe company describes itself as technology-based, emphasizes innovation, and reports three R&D engineers. These facts indicate some innovation and development resources, but no patents, documented new products, or measurable R&D outcomes are provided.

Production capacityThe supplier reports 2,200,000 sets of power-line hardware output, eight production lines, 37 employees, 6–10 quality-control staff, and fulfillment within 15 working days in both peak and off-peak seasons. These explicit operational figures support a positive assessment of production capability, although the relationship between the stated annual output and the broader annual-output claim is not fully explained.