High-Quality Teardrop Pallet Racking System for Global Distribution

Name: High-Quality Teardrop Pallet Racking System for Global Distribution
Brand: NANJING KAKU WAREHOUSE EQUIPMENT CO., LTD.
SKU: 2118383525

Jiangsu, ChinaNANJING KAKU WAREHOUSE EQUIPMENT CO., LTD.

US$1.20-2.80

500 kg

Sample price:US$0.00/piece.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

After-sales Service

24/7 Hours on Line

Warranty

2 Years

Model NO.

KKPR00001

Usage

Tool Rack, Beverage, Clothing, Tools, Supermarket, Food, Industrial, Warehouse Rack

Material

Steel

Structure

Rack

Type

Pallet Racking

Mobility

Adjustable

Height

5-15m

Closed

Open

Development

Conventional

Serviceability

Common Use

Transport Package

Packed by Pallets

Specification

Customized

Trademark

Kaku

Origin

China

HS Code

73089000

Production Capacity

50000kg/Year

Company profile

Cooperated with Fortune 500Fast DeliveryManagement CertificationProduct Certification

NANJING KAKU WAREHOUSE EQUIPMENT CO., LTD.

Jiangsu, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading Company, Group Corporation CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Samples, Customization from Designs CertifiedExport Year: 7 Years CertifiedNearest Port: Shanghai PortAverage Response Time: ≤0.16h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryNanjing Kaku Warehouse Equipment Co., Ltd., founded in 2016, focuses on the R&D, design, sales, installation, and after-sales service of warehousing equipment. It reports advanced automated and CNC production equipment, annual storage-racking output of 25,000 tons, and export markets across multiple regions. The supplier holds ISO 9001-related certification and reports AWS, CWB, and TUV certifications. It provides installation, maintenance, repair, and after-sales services, supported by documented service, corrective-action, and complaint-handling procedures. Evidence supports sample/design customization and recent new-product activity, but not ODM, 3D software design, or professional technical-supplier classification. Financial credibility cannot be fully assessed from the provided records, which mainly identify reporting years rather than financial performance. The supplier reports cooperation with Fortune 500 companies, while inventory, overseas warehouse, and overseas showroom capabilities are absent.

CertificationsThe supplier reports ISO 9001/ISO 9001:2015 certification, as well as AWS, CWB, and TUV certifications. These records provide explicit evidence of multiple quality and welding-related certifications.

After-Sales capabilityKaku reports professional installation teams plus maintenance, repair, and after-sales services. It also reports written and followed procedures for service assessment, corrective and preventive actions, and customer complaints, supporting an established service process.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports R&D and design involvement and states that it had new products during the past year. It also reports SDK availability, but explicitly does not provide 3D software design services or ODM services; the evidence therefore supports some innovation activity but not broad software or ODM capability.

Production capacityThe factory reports automatic cutting, CNC shearing and bending, automatic and robotic welding, powder spraying, and other production equipment, with stated storage-racking output of 25,000 tons and lead times within 15 workdays off-season and one month in peak season. However, it reports no in-stock service capacity, no overseas warehouse, and an unknown manufacturing-capacity contract status.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly offers customization from samples and customization from designs. It does not offer ODM services, but the stated sample- and design-based customization is direct evidence of customization capability.

Client casesThe supplier reports having collaborated with Fortune 500 companies and states a repeat-buyer preference rate of 80%–100%. The records do not identify the customers, projects, or outcomes, so the existence of reported cooperation is supported but the case depth cannot be independently assessed.