What is the pattern style of the bed skirt?

The bed skirt features an embroidered large rose jacquard pattern.

Is the fabric waterproof?

Yes, the fabric is designed to be waterproof and air-permeable.

Large Rose Jacquard Bed Skirt Set

Name: Large Rose Jacquard Bed Skirt Set
Brand: Taizhou Trendy Beauty Household Products Factory
SKU: 2150063642

Zhejiang, ChinaTaizhou Trendy Beauty Household Products Factory

US$15.50

50 Pieces

Product profile

Customization

Available

Usage

Hotel, Home

Feature

Waterproof, Air-Permeable

Model NO.

SL-004

Size

Full

Age Group

Adults

Pattern

Embroidered

Technics

Machine Embroidered

Style

Twill

Material

Cotton / Polyester

Transport Package

Carton Box

Specification

2.2*2.1

Trademark

CONGSHUMEI

Origin

China

HS Code

6302292090

Key features

Luxurious Jacquard Design: Beautifully woven large rose jacquard with 3D texture for timeless elegance.

Complete Bedding Set: Includes coordinating pillowcases for a unified and polished appearance.

Fade-Resistant Material: Soft cotton and polyester blend that resists fading and is easy to launder.

Neat Full Look: Sturdy fabric ensures a neat drape while effectively hiding bed bases.

Machine Embroidered: Crafted with machine embroidery techniques for precise and durable patterns.

Versatile Usage: Suitable for both hotel and home environments with a twill style.

Company profile

Taizhou Trendy Beauty Household Products Factory

Zhejiang, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service AvailableExport Year: 2015-06-02Nearest Port: NINGBOAverage Response Time: ≤15hTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryTaizhou Trendy Beauty Household Products Factory is a China-based private limited company combining trading and manufacturing activities, with 29 employees, five production lines, and Summer Mat Set as its stated product scope. It holds ISO 9001 certification and has 6–10 R&D engineers and 6–10 quality-control staff. Export sales represent 41%–50% of total sales, but export experience is stated as only one year. The supplier does not provide OEM services for popular brands, has no available SDK, no R&D patents, and lacks auditable R&D design documentation. Finished-product inspections follow instructions but have no written records. An SGS audit is recorded for the period from April 17, 2026 to April 16, 2027, but the stated evaluation result is not interpretable from the provided data. Financial records are referenced for multiple years, without sufficient information to assess credibility. No Fortune 500 partnerships or customer cases are provided.

Supplier typeThe supplier is identified as a private limited company in China and is described as both a trading company and manufacturer/factory. Its registered business activities include manufacturing and selling household goods and grass-related products, while its stated product scope is Summer Mat Set.

CertificationsThe supplier holds ISO 9001 certification. An SGS audit is also recorded for the stated product, with a report period from April 17, 2026 to April 16, 2027; however, the audit evaluation value of 0 is not explained, so no additional audit-performance conclusion can be drawn.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports 6–10 R&D engineers and assigns them R&D and product-improvement responsibilities. However, it has no available SDK, no R&D patents, and no auditable design-input, output, review, verification, or validation documentation, which limits evidence of formal innovation capability.

Production capacityThe supplier operates five production lines and has 29 employees, with manufacturing included in its company type and business scope. It also reports 6–10 quality-control staff, but finished-product inspections have instructions without written records, indicating a documented-quality weakness despite the stated production resources.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly does not provide OEM services for popular brands. Although R&D staff support product improvement, the absence of R&D audit documentation and the lack of an available SDK provide no evidence of robust customization execution.