Building Material Epoxy Resin Superior Stone Tile Adhesive

Name: Building Material Epoxy Resin Superior Stone Tile Adhesive
Brand: Kater Adhesives Industrial Co., Ltd.
SKU: 928303155

Guangdong, ChinaKater Adhesives Industrial Co., Ltd.

US$5.89

1,000-4,999 Pieces

US$5.49

5,000-19,999 Pieces

US$4.99

20,000-49,999 Pieces

US$4.69

50,000+ Pieces

Sample price:US$5.89/piece.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Application

Construction, Grout for Tile, Construction, Woodworking

Bonding Function

Grout for Tile, Oil Level Adhesive

Model NO.

K017

Color

Gold

Composition

Organic Material

Morphology

Paste

Morphology

Solvent

Material

Epoxy

Classification

Room Curing

Characteristic

Weatherability

Promoter Composition

Curing Agent

Composition

Inorganic Material

Color

26 Kinds of Color

Formula

C6h7no2

Main Agent Composition

Epoxy

CAS No.

7085-85-0

EINECS

C6h7no2T230-391-5

Shelf Time(25℃)

24months

Surface Dry Time

2-4 Hours

Full Dry Time

8-12 Hours

Features

Dirt-Resistance, Mildew-Resistance, etc

Applications

Ceramic, Glass, Kitchen, Wood, etc.

Cutting Length

70-80MPa

Keyword

Blue Tile Grout

Appearance

Paste

Transport Package

Carton Packaging

Specification

400ml/pc

Trademark

kastar

Origin

Hunan. China

HS Code

35061000

Production Capacity

10000cartons

Company profile

Standardized Supplier ManagementFull CustomizationStandardized quality controlManagement Certification

Kater Adhesives Industrial Co., Ltd.

Guangdong, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Samples, Customization from Designs, etc. CertifiedExport Year: 23 Years CertifiedNearest Port: Foshan Port, Guangzhou Port, Shenzhen PortAverage Response Time: ≤2.41h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier manufactures and sells silicone rubber products, plastic products, and sealant fillers, with import and export capability. It reports 20 production lines, in-stock capacity, lead times within 15 workdays in both peak and off-season periods, and access to nearby Foshan, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen ports. The supplier states that it has more than 300 OEM customers and holds ISO9001, CE, and SGS certifications; however, the structured data separately indicates no OEM service for popular brands. Its R&D supports several forms of customization and reports new products in the past year, but it does not provide ODM, 3D design, or SDK services. Limitations include no valid manufacturing-capacity contract with related subcontractors, no overseas warehouse, agents, branches, showroom, or offline trade-show participation, and no regular fire drills in the past year. Financial evidence is insufficient for a substantive credibility assessment.

Supplier typeThe supplier is identified as a combined company engaged in production, manufacturing, sales, and import/export of silicone rubber products, plastic products, and sealant fillers. It is not described as an offshore company and reports no overseas agents or branches, indicating a primarily direct, factory-based supplier structure.

CertificationsThe company description states that the factory has passed ISO9001, CE, and SGS certification, while the structured data specifically identifies an ISO9001:2015 certificate. These are explicit certification claims, although the slices do not provide certificate validity dates or scope details.

Production capacityThe supplier reports 20 production lines, in-stock capacity, more than 300 OEM customers, and lead times within 15 workdays year-round. Countervailing weaknesses are the absence of a valid manufacturing-capacity contract with related subcontractors, no ongoing batch quantity reconciliation, and no standard operating procedure for outsourced manufacturing.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly supports customization from samples, designs, full customization, minor customization, and flexible customization. It does not provide 3D software design or ODM services, so the evidence supports product customization but not comprehensive design-led development.