Free Sample OEM Gp Silicone Sealant Kastar 730 Acetic Adhesive

Name: Free Sample OEM Gp Silicone Sealant Kastar 730 Acetic Adhesive
Brand: Kater Adhesives Industrial Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2176218855

Guangdong, ChinaKater Adhesives Industrial Co., Ltd.

US$0.38-0.88

6,000 Pieces

Sample price:US$0.01/piece.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Application

Automobile, Construction, Packing, Lithium Battery Potting, Woodworking

Bonding Function

Structural Adhesive

Model NO.

730

Color

White

Composition

Organic Material

Morphology

Paste Sealant

Model Number

Kastar Gp 730 Silicone Sealant

Type

Single Component Sillicone Sealant

Product Name

Gp Silicone Sealant

Main Material

Silicone Rubber

Packaging

280ml/300ml Plastic Cartridge

Carton

24 Cartridges

Appearance

Smooth Paste Without Bubble or Particles

Certificate

ISO9001:2000, MSDS

OEM/OEM

Available

Usage

Construction, Packing, Woodworking, Lithium Batter

CAS No.

68928-70-1

Formula

C36h32br8o6

EINECS

201-177-9

Material

Silicone

Classification

Room Curing

Main Agent Composition

Rubber

Characteristic

Waterproof

Promoter Composition

Curing Agent

Transport Package

24 Pices in Package

Specification

300x200x240mm

Trademark

KASTAR or OEM

Origin

Guangdong

HS Code

3506100010

Production Capacity

70000 Pices / Day

Company profile

Standardized Supplier ManagementFull CustomizationStandardized quality controlManagement Certification

Kater Adhesives Industrial Co., Ltd.

Guangdong, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Samples, Customization from Designs, etc. CertifiedExport Year: 23 Years CertifiedNearest Port: Foshan Port, Guangzhou Port, Shenzhen PortAverage Response Time: ≤2.16h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier manufactures and sells silicone rubber products, plastic products, and sealant fillers, with import and export capability. It reports 20 production lines, in-stock capacity, lead times within 15 workdays in both peak and off-season periods, and access to nearby Foshan, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen ports. The supplier states that it has more than 300 OEM customers and holds ISO9001, CE, and SGS certifications; however, the structured data separately indicates no OEM service for popular brands. Its R&D supports several forms of customization and reports new products in the past year, but it does not provide ODM, 3D design, or SDK services. Limitations include no valid manufacturing-capacity contract with related subcontractors, no overseas warehouse, agents, branches, showroom, or offline trade-show participation, and no regular fire drills in the past year. Financial evidence is insufficient for a substantive credibility assessment.

Supplier typeThe supplier is identified as a combined company engaged in production, manufacturing, sales, and import/export of silicone rubber products, plastic products, and sealant fillers. It is not described as an offshore company and reports no overseas agents or branches, indicating a primarily direct, factory-based supplier structure.

CertificationsThe company description states that the factory has passed ISO9001, CE, and SGS certification, while the structured data specifically identifies an ISO9001:2015 certificate. These are explicit certification claims, although the slices do not provide certificate validity dates or scope details.

Production capacityThe supplier reports 20 production lines, in-stock capacity, more than 300 OEM customers, and lead times within 15 workdays year-round. Countervailing weaknesses are the absence of a valid manufacturing-capacity contract with related subcontractors, no ongoing batch quantity reconciliation, and no standard operating procedure for outsourced manufacturing.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly supports customization from samples, designs, full customization, minor customization, and flexible customization. It does not provide 3D software design or ODM services, so the evidence supports product customization but not comprehensive design-led development.