Hot Selling Export Sparkling Water Mix Fruit Flavors Beverage Carbonated Drink

Name: Hot Selling Export Sparkling Water Mix Fruit Flavors Beverage Carbonated Drink
Brand: Shandong Gaotang JBS Bioengineering Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2134245985

Shandong, ChinaShandong Gaotang JBS Bioengineering Co., Ltd.

US$7.00

100,000-199,999 Boxes

US$6.80

200,000-499,999 Boxes

US$5.80

500,000+ Boxes

Sample price:US$6.00/box.Request sample

Product profile

Type

Carbonated Drink

Packaging Material

Metal Cans

Storage Method

Normal

Model NO.

Carbonated Drink

Shelf Life

>12 Months

Flavor

Fruit

Volume

250ml/500ml/330ml/Others

Feature

Low-Sugar, Low-Fat, Low-Salt, Normal

Primary Ingredient

Caffeine, Ginseng, Taurine, Vitamin & Minerals

Service

Finished Products, Custom

Transport Package

Carton

Specification

20 cans/carton

Trademark

laizhi&OEM

Origin

China

HS Code

2202100090

Production Capacity

100, 000 Pieces/Hours

Company profile

Shandong Gaotang JBS Bioengineering Co., Ltd.Shandong, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service Available CertifiedCustomization Options: Customization from Samples, Customization from Designs, etc. CertifiedExport Year: 18 Years CertifiedNearest Port: Qingdao PortAverage Response Time: ≤7.21h

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is identified as a manufacturing factory in Gaotang County, Liaocheng, with 18 years of export experience and export sales representing 21%–30% of total sales. It supports extensive customization, ODM, and OEM services, and launched new products during the past year with two R&D engineers reported. Production-related controls include documented finished-product inspection, written supplier-service procedures, inventory capability, and peak/off-season lead times within 15 working days. After-sales processes are supported by documented corrective-action and complaint-handling procedures. However, the supplier has no valid manufacturing-capacity contract with associated subcontractors, no overseas warehouse, overseas showroom, overseas agents or branches, and no offline trade-show participation. Certification details are recorded only as “Others,” while financial records are represented by years rather than substantive financial indicators. No Fortune 500 cooperation or available SDK is reported.

Supplier typeThe supplier is explicitly identified as a factory, while its associated companies operate in manufacturing. This supports classification as a manufacturing supplier rather than a trading-only entity.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier has clear procedures and followed records for corrective and preventive actions and customer complaint handling, and reports quality assurance in its quality-control processes. These documented mechanisms explicitly support after-sales issue handling.

R&D capabilityThe supplier reports new products during the past year, ODM capability, and two R&D engineers. It also lacks an available SDK, but that limitation does not negate the explicit evidence of product-development activity.

Production capacityProduction support is evidenced by factory status, inventory capability, documented and consistently followed finished-product inspection instructions, written supplier-service procedures with records, and lead times within 15 working days in both peak and off-season periods. However, the supplier reports no valid capacity contract with associated subcontractors, which creates a documented capacity-governance weakness but does not establish an overall production incapacity.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly offers customization from samples, customization from designs, full customization, minor customization, and flexible customization, and also provides ODM services. This indicates broad customization coverage.

Client casesThe supplier reports OEM services for well-known brands and repeat-buyer preference of 50%–80%, providing positive customer-experience evidence. However, it reports no cooperation with Fortune 500 companies, so the evidence does not support a top-tier global customer case specifically.