55" Wall Mounted Android Tablet LCD Screen

Name: Factory Price Android All in One PC 32"/43"/49"/55" Wall Mounted Android Tablet LCD Screen
Brand: Shenzhen LCDKIOSK Technology Co., Ltd.
SKU: 1978541691

Guangdong, ChinaShenzhen LCDKIOSK Technology Co., Ltd.

US$639.00-999.00

1 Piece

Sample price:US$659.00/piece.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Screen Size

32/43/49/55inch

Application

Indoor, Advertising, Big-Screen Project, Graphic Design

Model NO.

Capacitive, Infrared, LCD, Resistive, Touchscreen

Aspect ratio

16:9

Feature

Touch Display, LED Backlight Display, With Remote Control, Support TV Function

Optimum Resolution

1920x1080

Type

IPS

Widescreen

Response Time

6ms

3D

Not 3D

Interface Type

HDMI

Installation

Wall Mounted

Touch Screen Type

Capacitive/Infrared

Screen Technology

LCD

Remote Control

with Remote Control

Customized

Multi-Touch

10-Point Touch

Recognition Principle

Capacitive Touch or Infrared Touch

CPU

Quad-Core Cortex-A55

Memory (DDR4)

2GB (4GB Optional)

Storage (Flash)

16GB (8GB/32GB/64GB Optional)

Transport Package

Wooden Box

Specification

IPS

Trademark

ODM/OEM

Origin

China

HS Code

8471494000

Production Capacity

2000

Company profile

Importers and ExportersFast DeliveryLow MOQMinor Customization

Shenzhen LCDKIOSK Technology Co., Ltd.

Guangdong, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service Available CertifiedExport Year: 6 Years CertifiedNearest Port: Shenzhen PortAverage Response Time: ≤7.80h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryLCDKIOSK Technology is identified as a combined company in Shenzhen, China, focused on designing, developing, and manufacturing self-service kiosks. It operates one production line and reports specified output across several kiosk products, with peak- and off-season lead times within 15 working days. The supplier offers minor customization but explicitly does not provide ODM services, OEM services for popular brands, or an available SDK. Quality assurance is reported, but finished-product inspection lacks written records, corrective and preventive actions lack written procedures or records, complaint handling has a procedure without written records, and material traceability is unavailable. No valid manufacturing contract with related subcontractors, inventory service, overseas warehouse, overseas showroom, overseas agents, or branches is reported. Financial-capacity information is limited to year labels, while sustainability fire-drill and environmental-assessment status is unknown. No customer cases or...

Supplier typeThe supplier is classified as a combined company, and its stated business is the design, development, and manufacturing of self-service kiosk solutions in Shenzhen, China. This provides a clear supplier identity and operating focus.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier reports no in-stock service, overseas warehouse, overseas showroom, overseas agents, or branches. Complaint handling has a procedure but no written records, and corrective and preventive actions have no written procedures or records, indicating documented after-sales support is limited.

R&D capabilityThe company describes itself as emphasizing innovation and provides design, development, and manufacturing of kiosk solutions. However, it explicitly does not provide ODM services and has no available SDK, so the evidence does not establish a strong innovation or platform-development advantage.

Production capacityThe supplier operates one production line and lists output for multiple kiosk products, including indoor, outdoor, touch, wall-mounted, and customized models. Lead times are stated as within 15 working days in both peak and off-season, but there is no inventory capacity and no valid contract with related subcontractors.

Customization capabilityThe supplier produces customized kiosk models and reports minor customization capability, supported by its stated design and manufacturing focus. The evidence supports limited customization rather than broad or advanced customization, and ODM service is explicitly unavailable.