What payment terms do you accept?

We accept LC, T/T, D/P, and PayPal.

Are the materials tested for safety?

Yes, raw materials are tested and certified to meet RoHS standards.

PU Sole Protector Antistatic Working Safety Footwear ESD Shoe

Name: PU Sole Protector Antistatic Working Safety Footwear ESD Shoe
Brand: Suzhou Linclean Technology Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2076762475

Jiangsu, ChinaSuzhou Linclean Technology Co., Ltd.

US$15.90

100-499 Pairs

US$14.90

500-999 Pairs

US$13.50

1,000+ Pairs

Sample price:US$19.00/pair.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

Size

Usage

Semiconductor

Season

All Seasons

Condition

New

Waterproof

Material

Type

ESD Safety Shoes

Transport Package

Single Layer Vacuum Pumping

Specification

35-50

Trademark

Linclean

Origin

Jiangsu

HS Code

6403990090

Production Capacity

5000000pairs/Year

Key features

Steel Toe Safety Design: Features steel toe cap for puncture proof and anti-smashing protection.

All-Season Waterproof: Designed for winter, summer, spring, and autumn with waterproof PU material.

Dust-Free Cleanroom Ready: Ideal for semiconductor, automotive, aerospace, and PCB industries.

Customizable OEM/ODM: OEM and ODM services available for custom branding and specifications.

Wide Size Range: Available in sizes 34 to 50 for unisex fit.

Durable PU Construction: Midsole and outsole made of high-quality PU for long-lasting wear.

RoHS Certified Materials: Raw materials tested and certified to meet RoHS standards.

Company profile

Suzhou Linclean Technology Co., Ltd.

Jiangsu, China

CertifiedBusiness Type: Manufacturer/Factory & Trading Company CertifiedR&D Capacity: ODM Service Available & OEM Service AvailableExport Year: 2023-07-07 CertifiedNearest Port: Shanghai Port, Ningbo Port, Yantian PortAverage Response Time: ≤3.17h CertifiedTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummarySuzhou Linclean Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based limited company established in 2017, operating in the dust-free and anti-static products sector. It reports ISO9001:2015 and ISO14001:2015 certifications, cleanroom production and inspection facilities, more than 10 production lines, and product coverage including ESD clothing, shoes, cleanroom wipers, paper, fabric, and gloves. The supplier describes itself as integrating R&D, production, and sales, but the available evidence is inconsistent regarding organizational scale: six employees and one year of R&D engineer experience are reported alongside 50 quality-control staff and high production-capacity claims. One associated buyer and one trade transaction are identified. Evidence is insufficient to confirm after-sales service, customization, or a broad customer track record.

Supplier typeThe supplier is identified as a combined business entity and limited company, founded in 2017 in Jiangsu, China. Its stated business model integrates research and development, production, and sales, with products focused on security and protection, particularly ESD and cleanroom supplies.

CertificationsThe supplier explicitly reports ISO9001:2015 and ISO14001:2015 management-system certificates. It also states that products passed SGS halogen and RoHS testing, although the provided information does not include certificate numbers, validity dates, or testing documentation.

R&D capabilityThe supplier explicitly presents itself as technology-based, combining R&D, production, and sales, and emphasizes independent R&D, technological innovation, and converting research into product applications. Its stated R&D engineering experience is one year, so the existence of an innovation focus is supported, but the depth and results of its R&D capability are not fully demonstrated.

Production capacityThe supplier reports more than 10 production lines, cleanrooms rated at Class 100 and Class 1,000, a Class 10 inspection room, imported production equipment, and a manufacturing plant of 262.0 m². It also states off-peak lead times within 15 working days and peak fulfillment within one month; however, the reported production-output figure is inconsistent with the separately stated annual revenue and should be verified.