Two Bin Automatic Sandbag Filling Machine High Capacity Sand Selling Factory Equipment

Name: Two Bin Automatic Sandbag Filling Machine High Capacity Sand Selling Factory Equipment
Brand: Yeston (Jining) Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd.
SKU: 2165849962

Shandong, ChinaYeston (Jining) Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd.

US$1,500.00

1 Piece

Sample price:US$3300.00/piece.Request sample

Product profile

Customization

Available

After-sales Service

One Year

Warranty

One Year

Model NO.

Dual hoppers

Type

Piston Filling Machine

Automatic Grade

Semi-Automatic

Material Type

Granular

Filling Valve Head

Multi-Head

Feed Cylinder Structure

Single-Room Feeding

Dosing Device

Plunger

Filling Principle

Pressure

Packaging Container Lifting Structure

Chute Lifting

Structure

Rotary

Packaging

Bag

Packaging Material

Plastic

Capacity

7m³

Number of Employees

Bagging Speed

2 Seconds/Bag

Voltage

3800V

Transport Package

Sea Freight

Specification

2800×2700×3500mm

Trademark

yeston

Origin

China

HS Code

8422303090

Production Capacity

100000

Key features

Fully Automatic Operation, Greatly Save Labor Cost

Single Hopper & Double Hopper Optional, Flexible Production Capacity

Eco-friendly & Low Dust Design, Meet Environmental Standards

Precise Quantitative Feeding, Uniform Bag Weight & Low Material Waste

Sturdy & Durable Structure, Low Failure Rate for Harsh Site

Compact Body with Mobile Wheels, Multi-scene Application

Company profile

Importers and ExportersHigh Repeat Buyers ChoiceFull CustomizationR&D Capabilities

Yeston (Jining) Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd.

Shandong, China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading Company, Group CorporationExport Year: 2007-02-06Nearest Port: qingdaoAverage Response Time: ≤2.57hTerms of Payment: LC, T/T, D/P, etc.International Commercial Terms(Incoterms): FOB, EXW, CFR, CIF, DAT, FAS, DDP, DAP, CIP, CPT, Others, FCA

AI-Powered supplier vetting

SummaryThe supplier is identified as a China-based manufacturer/factory and limited company operating in Shandong, offering lawn mowers, road machinery, forklift forks, electrical appliances, agricultural machinery, mining machinery, and construction machinery. It explicitly provides OEM services for well-known brands, but has no available SDK. Its stated workforce is six employees, while inventory, overseas warehouse, overseas showroom, overseas agents or branches, and overseas service coverage are absent. Service details include equipment installation, training, repair, maintenance, and debugging, and a customer-complaint procedure with follow-up records exists. Audit-related information is present, but the supplied slices do not establish certification holdings or a positive audit outcome. Financial and sustainability indicators are represented only by years or unknown statuses, so financial credibility cannot be determined.

After-Sales capabilityThe supplier states that it offers equipment installation, training, repair, maintenance, and debugging, and it has a clear customer-complaint procedure with follow-up records. However, it has no overseas agents or branches, no overseas service countries, no overseas warehouse, and no overseas showroom; its corrective and preventive action mechanism lacks written procedures or records.

R&D capabilityThe supplier is explicitly recorded as having no available SDK, which is a stated limitation in the requested research and development capability. No other evidence demonstrates compensating R&D or innovation strength.

Production capacityThe supplier is identified as a manufacturer/factory, conducts or lists manufacturing across machinery categories, and has a broad stated product scope. However, it has only six employees, no in-stock capability, and unknown outsourcing procedures and manufacturing-capacity contract status; the evidence supports manufacturing activity but not strong or scalable capacity.

Customization capabilityThe supplier explicitly provides OEM services for well-known brands, directly supporting its ability to produce customized or private-label products. The lack of an available SDK limits evidence for software-related customization, but does not negate the stated OEM capability.